Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2012/12/20 Pieren : > > The point about car navigation systems is > > incorrect. It does not care about the highway way position (and no > GPS > > device is accurate enough to determine on which lane you are). > > > I wouldn't be so sure about that, professional GPS

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/12/20 Pieren : > The point about car navigation systems is > incorrect. It does not care about the highway way position (and no GPS > device is accurate enough to determine on which lane you are). I wouldn't be so sure about that, professional GPS devices are that precise, and by combining s

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-20 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Henning Scholland wrote: > For me this isn't a good alternative for "drawing" the highway as an area. > This is simple to understand and very flexible. It's not useful to have more > or less two ways of tagging. Maybe you could explain, why it is useful ? The wik

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-20 Thread Henning Scholland
Am 20.12.2012 17:42, schrieb Martin Vonwald: You have one tag: placement. Its value tells you where the OSM-way is: * no tag -> in the middle of the road * transition -> not parallel to any lane * middle_of -> in the middle of on lane * right_of/left_of -> right or left of one lane. Too complica

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-20 Thread Martin Vonwald
You have one tag: placement. Its value tells you where the OSM-way is: * no tag -> in the middle of the road * transition -> not parallel to any lane * middle_of -> in the middle of on lane * right_of/left_of -> right or left of one lane. Too complicated? 2012/12/20 Frederik Ramm : > Hi, > > > On

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-20 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 12/20/2012 04:43 PM, Martin Vonwald wrote: Although it is still a draft I would like to get some feedback on this proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/placement Who is your target group - who do you think would be understanding and using this tagging scheme?

[Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-20 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi everyone, Although it is still a draft I would like to get some feedback on this proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/placement Please excuse some inconsistencies or missing parts - it's a draft and not yet polished. Thanks in advance, Martin ___

Re: [Tagging] non-trivial color schemes

2012-12-20 Thread Jonathan Bennett
On 20/12/2012 12:10, Stephen Gower wrote: > blazon=barry gules and argent Barry Gules and Argent? Didn't they split up in 1974? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] non-trivial color schemes

2012-12-20 Thread Stephen Gower
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:58:45AM -0500, Richard Welty wrote: > there). i looked at a couple of dry hydrants yesterday and guess > what - red & white stripes. blazon=barry gules and argent http://heralds.westkingdom.org/Templates/Fields/index.htm (I'm not serious) s __

Re: [Tagging] How to map an artificial ground wall?

2012-12-20 Thread Janko Mihelić
IMHO you should add a new way that only has those tags. You can share the nodes with the barrier=embankment if you think the top of the wall is the border between the aeroway and the outside. If the bottom of the wall is the border, make the aeroway a little wider. By the way, mapnik renders man_m