Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Gross vehicle weight rating

2012-11-27 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi martinq, Good summary. We must have been working on it at the same time as I have just copied the wiki discussion to [1] (and liberally edited it to break it into sections and make it easier to follow). I suggest we keep discussions to this mailing list and the maxweight talk page (where it is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Gross vehicle weight rating

2012-11-27 Thread martinq
Hi, > How does this compare to other countries? The "Vienna Convention on road signs" is always a good basis for such discussions. It harmonizes the meaning of traffic signs in almost 100 countries of the world. Consolidated version of the convention: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Gross vehicle weight rating

2012-11-27 Thread Rob Nickerson
>Hi Rob, > >Am Montag, 26. November 2012, 20:33:08 schrieb Rob Nickerson: >>* Conclusion - in the UK all weight limits are Gross Vehicle Weight >>Rating*>>* limits and thus maxweight=* and hgv:maxweight=* would be enough.*> >except that maxweight does *not* limit the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating, b

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Gross vehicle weight rating

2012-11-27 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Rob, Am Montag, 26. November 2012, 20:33:08 schrieb Rob Nickerson: > Conclusion - in the UK all weight limits are Gross Vehicle Weight Rating > limits and thus maxweight=* and hgv:maxweight=* would be enough. except that maxweight does *not* limit the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating, but the actu