Am Sonntag, 29. April 2012, 17:08:05 schrieb Eckhart Wörner:
> based on the changes I believe are important I added a modified proposal to
> the wiki:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Proposed_features/New_TMC_scheme#Neues_Proposal
>
> Changes:
> * Versions are an (optional) part of t
On Apr 29, 2012 10:44 AM, "Martin Koppenhoefer"
wrote:
>
> 2012/4/29 Kytömaa Lauri :
> >>police doesn't enforce the official rules, then there are factually
> >>more lanes on the ground than painted on the road.
> >
> > Isn't that equal to cycling on sidewalks: we shouldn't tag
> > sidewalks with
2012/4/29 Kytömaa Lauri :
>>police doesn't enforce the official rules, then there are factually
>>more lanes on the ground than painted on the road.
>
> Isn't that equal to cycling on sidewalks: we shouldn't tag
> sidewalks with bicycle=yes (in coutries where cyclists may
> not use them), even if o
On 29/04/12 18:57, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, 29. April 2012, 18:49:39 schrieb fly:
>> I have only one point left:
>> What to do with more than on TMC route on one way. Do we still need
>> relations
>> for that ?
>
> no, we don't. My modified proposal skipped over that section (sinc
Hi Colliar,
Am Sonntag, 29. April 2012, 18:49:39 schrieb fly:
> I have only one point left:
> What to do with more than on TMC route on one way. Do we still need relations
> for that ?
no, we don't. My modified proposal skipped over that section (since I changed
nothing in it), but the original
On 29/04/12 17:08, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
Hi everybody + Eckhart
>
> based on the changes I believe are important I added a modified proposal to
> the wiki:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Proposed_features/New_TMC_scheme#Neues_Proposal
>
> Changes:
> * Versions are an (optional) p
Martin Koppenhoefer hat am 29. April 2012 um 17:39
geschrieben:
> 2012/4/29 Kytömaa Lauri :
> > http://i46.tinypic.com/2cfqivn.png
> >
> > Which value would people use for the lanes=*?
> >
> I think I wouldn't tag any lanes explicitly here. Looks like a
> residential road. I wouldn't expect many
>police doesn't enforce the official rules, then there are factually
>more lanes on the ground than painted on the road.
Isn't that equal to cycling on sidewalks: we shouldn't tag
sidewalks with bicycle=yes (in coutries where cyclists may
not use them), even if only a dozen or so get a fine each
>Looks as if 2 cars can pass each other without big problems.
Only in the utopia where all drivers can confidently
manouver their cars at speed to gaps only 10-20 cm
wider than their car. Most people don't.
The white car already has it's right hand wheels
outside the normal driving surface. And
2012/4/29 Kytömaa Lauri :
> http://i46.tinypic.com/2cfqivn.png
>
> Which value would people use for the lanes=*?
I think I wouldn't tag any lanes explicitly here. Looks like a
residential road. I wouldn't expect many trucks in this zone, but if I
were to map more detail I'd add a width-tag. Looks
>Before that I added a point in the Open issues section about lanes=1.5
>and modified the note at the end of the section Narrow road. As
So, today I got a chance to revisit an unpaved residential road
I've tagged as lanes=1.5 in the distant past. Here's two
pictures of it (in one)
Above, usual
Hi everybody,
based on the changes I believe are important I added a modified proposal to the
wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Proposed_features/New_TMC_scheme#Neues_Proposal
Changes:
* Versions are an (optional) part of the proposal. If they are not needed, they
can be left out
* Martin Vonwald [2012-04-25 10:28 +0200]:
> I'm trying to view the OSMI layers in JOSM. The all-knowing,
> all-seeing trash heap pointed me to this (german) article:
> http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9315
>
> There it is recommended to use the following link in JOSM:
> http://too
As no further issues were raised with the updated article I will
replace the current lanes-article with my current version.
Before that I added a point in the Open issues section about lanes=1.5
and modified the note at the end of the section Narrow road. As
lanes=1.5 wasn't documented before and
Those examples are very good. Any chance we could get some
license-compatible photos in the near future?
2012/4/21 Philip Barnes :
> On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 10:19 +0200, Ronnie Soak wrote:
>
>> I would only use a lanes value other than 2 if there are clear road
>> markings, signs or it is otherwise
15 matches
Mail list logo
