On 3/6/12 9:22 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I just found the idea of saying "this is a railway - a never-built one, but
a railway nonetheless" a little extravagant.
umm, not never built. never completed. and in this case, a never completed
rail
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> I wouldn't agree with
> planned-but-abandoned features being stored except in unusual
> circumstances.
>
Key distinction is
planned-but-never-built (county plat book fantasy "roads"),
vs built, used, then abandoned
(subca
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Nah, it was rather about what the priority is. A constrution site could
> always be annotated with "this is planned to become a hotel", even though it
> isn't a hotel; and a cut could always be annotated with "this was once
> planned to becom
Martin Vonwald wrote:
~ 11.500 cycleway:left/right
~ 10.000 footway=left/right, 22.000 if you count "both" (same proposal)
~ 4.500 footway:left/right/both:*
As far as I understand, those are ways next to the carriageway.
If they are mapped as tags on the highway=* way, rather than as separ
On 06/03/2012, at 10.43, Pieren wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ross Scanlon
wrote:
Definitely not how to map an intersection. AU list have had several
discussions on this and it's junk mapping.
I still believe that mapping each lane is easier than using verbose
and encrypted tags
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
> > Definitely not how to map an intersection. AU list have had several
> > discussions on this and it's junk mapping.
>
> I still believe that mapping each lane is easier than using verbose
> a
> The much more relevant precedent are existing attempts to tag lanes. One
> example is indeed lanes:forward/backward. But there are other examples for
> existing lane tagging which are also documented on the wiki, and used more
> frequently than your example according to taginfo:
>
> ~ 11.500 cycl
Martin Vonwald wrote:
1) The objective part: How is it done currently? Take a look at my
first example in the proposal - it's using maxspeed. How is maxspeed
currently tagged? According to the wiki maxspeed:forward and
maxspeed:backward should be used. What tells use taginfo? The
forward/backward
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ross Scanlon wrote:
> Definitely not how to map an intersection. AU list have had several
> discussions on this and it's junk mapping.
I still believe that mapping each lane is easier than using verbose
and encrypted tags (probably that need some special tools on
On 06/03/12 03:32, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/05/2012 08:12 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes_and_complex_intersections_visual_approach
User Cmuelle8 insists on adding it to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_tagging_comparison#A_visual_approach
as
> However, routers already need to handle country-specific traffic rules
> anyway (for things like default maxspeeds, implied access rights, and so
> on). This is not usually the case for renderers.
>
> Therefore, wouldn't it make more sense to pick renderers as the application
> category that can
11 matches
Mail list logo
