>Are there any other OSM conventions that indicate a lack of a facility? Maybe:
>toilets=no
Not going into the wiki-approved new schemes, currently many highway=bus_stop
nodes have one or more of:
shelter=no (54800)
bench=no
timetable=no
waste_basket=no
departures_board=no
Each of these
On 11/08/2011 09:19 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 9 November 2011 16:12, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I've run into a curious use of a tag, to map the lack of a thing.
At least that's what I think mappers are doing.
One might normally expect a well, mountain hut, highway rest area, or toilet
to offer drink
On 11/14/2011 05:05 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/11/14 Bryce Nesbitt:
I'd like to use a tag to flag if a particular bit of infrastructure is
broken.
I am overall in favour of this proposal, but I think some things
should be expanded.
* the "maintenance" key is not clear to me. You prop
I don't use potlatch, but this is not really the right place to ask. This
mailing list is for proposing and discussing new tags or new ways of
tagging.
If you want direct help (instead of a discussion), you should use the help
centre: http://help.openstreetmap.org/
Regards,
Sander
2011/11/14 Dav
Hi
Is anybody else having problems tagging 'sport' in P2, or is it just me?
The tag just disappears after I type in the name of the sport.
Dave F.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2011/11/14 Bryce Nesbitt :
> I'd like to use a tag to flag if a particular bit of infrastructure is
> broken.
>
> See also:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Drinking_water_attributes
>
> I've heard arguments against "condition" and "repair".
>
> The goal of the tag is to event
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 11/8/2011 2:03 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
>> Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>>
>>> What I mean is that if the ridges can be auto-generated, they can be
>>> rendered without being in the database.
They can't be auto-generated from gridded DEMs. Consider these neighboured
Kytömaa Lauri wrote:
>
> Unfortunately that srtm data ends at 60° N: http://osm.org/go/0TORO--
Actually it ends at 61° N, with the last 1° block starting at 60° N. For some
reason the cylce map no longer uses that last block.
> And it's eventually way too scarse.
Right.
--
Arne Johannessen
