Adding to the confusion, many of the people in this current discussion seem to
interpret "capital" as meaning the primary city of a region or country (without
defining whether they mean largest population, leading cultural center, etc.),
instead of the standard meaning of "capital", namely the a
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:02 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> I agree with the quick and dirty hack part,
>
>
Yes, you are enforcing a tag just because it's working with osm2pgsql where
the better "admin_centre" role in the relation is not yet supported (I could
understand for places without rela
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:54:30 -0800
Daniel Sabo wrote:
> My inclination on the mine facilities would be: The actual pit &
> surroundings are landuse=quarry, the proccessing facilities are
> landuse=industrial + individual buildings. Do the buildings have
> names beyond their purpose? If not just na
A site relation could be appropriate to describe that they are all related to
the mine but don't fit inside of a single polygon.
If the entire community (mine + housing + airport) is all part of the mine I
would map it as place=hamlet, name=such and such mine. In that case draw the
place polygo
Elizabeth Dodd writes:
>
> > 2011/2/5 Elizabeth Dodd billiau.net>:
> > > I'm tracing a big open cast mine ...
>
> the residential village and the airstrip are part of the mining site
> from the social and economic points of view - single owner, single
> purpose
> the 132km of haul road also b
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:31:57 -0500
Richard Weait wrote:
> We've not used any indication that an appointment is required for tags
> like amenity=doctors. Can we just leave that be as it seems to have
> been presumed opening_hours:by_appointment=yes
On exactly this point, we have opening hours. Du
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:04:36 +0100
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/2/5 Elizabeth Dodd :
> > I'm tracing a big open cast mine which has
> >
> > pit; tailings dump; ore dump; processing plant to concentrate
> > ore; water supply; container loading facility for concentrate (goes
> > in smallish con
2011/2/5 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" :
> Personally, I think of capital=* as a quick and dirty way to mark the
> capitals mainly of countries (and states). -)
I agree with the quick and dirty hack part, but I don't see why this
should be limited to national capitals. I am using these tags in Italy
Personally, I think of capital=* as a quick and dirty way to mark the
capitals mainly of countries (and states). To tag the centre of a lower
administrative level, add it as admin_centre role into the appropriate
relation. No need to re-invent the wheel ;-)
Petr
Colin Smale napsal(a):
> I'm not s
I'm not sure that it would be wise to imply that a capital of an area is
also the capital of lower-level areas. There are plenty of examples
where this is NOT the case; Amsterdam is the capital of The Netherlands
(but NOT the seat of government), but Haarlem is the capital of the
province which
The taginfo seem to be silent on how to tag a shop or service that is
only open by appointment. A discussion on the wiki has some
interesting points.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:opening_hours#Museum_opens_only_on_request
opening_hours=by_appointment seems logical but collides wit
2011/2/5 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> I think this is OK. Below admin_level=4, there are no coterminous capitals.
you should be aware that admin_level=3;4 will not be evaluated by most
of our applications, that's why the semicolon should be avoided if
possible (IMHO).
I think that capital=6 (it is in
2011/2/5 Elizabeth Dodd :
> I'm tracing a big open cast mine which has
>
> pit; tailings dump; ore dump; processing plant to concentrate
> ore; water supply; container loading facility for concentrate (goes in
> smallish containers by road to a rail siding)
>
> I've got a major shortage of tags and
I think this is OK. Below admin_level=4, there are no coterminous capitals.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:50 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2011/2/5 Eugene Alvin Villar :
>> I've modified this to capital=3;4 since it is also the provincial capital.
>
>
> I'd only set the highest admin_level (lowest
2011/2/5 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> I've modified this to capital=3;4 since it is also the provincial capital.
I'd only set the highest admin_level (lowest number) on the node.
Otherwise you would probably have to tag most nodes with
capital=3;4;6;8;10 or something like that. I'd use relations for m
I've modified this to capital=3;4 since it is also the provincial capital.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2011/2/5 Eugene Alvin Villar :
>> San Fernando should be capital=3 since it is the admin center for a
>> region (which is admin_level = 3).
>
>
> can you set thi
2011/2/5 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> San Fernando should be capital=3 since it is the admin center for a
> region (which is admin_level = 3).
can you set this?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.or
San Fernando should be capital=3 since it is the admin center for a
region (which is admin_level = 3).
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:00 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Daniel Sabo :
>> In this specific case it seems safe to convert capital=true -> capital=yes,
>> but the other values I'm le
I'm tracing a big open cast mine which has
pit; tailings dump; ore dump; processing plant to concentrate
ore; water supply; container loading facility for concentrate (goes in
smallish containers by road to a rail siding)
I've got a major shortage of tags and don't have anyone nearby to ask
about
19 matches
Mail list logo
