I see that leisure=nature_reserve is now rendered "transparently"
(example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.7687&lon=-81.4594&zoom=12&layers=M).
Does this mean that there should be another landuse-type tag on it as
well? It looks kind of silly to have the unorganized conservation
lands render
Hi All.
The voting-period is extended...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/anime
Best regards,
ergo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
As has been said before, it does not make too much sense to map the
coastline along the mean high water level in mangrove areas and
(probably) salt marshes, which +-always are below the HMWL. Here in
north Brazil, I just map the non-vegetated, flooded areas as sea, having
mangroves, beaches and mar
2011/1/19 :
> Some jurisdictions define city status in law, some don't. Among those
> jurisdictions that do define cities in law, not all use the same definition.
> This not only can vary from country to country, but even within the same
> country (for example, in the USA, the state of Tennes
Some jurisdictions define city status in law, some don't. Among those
jurisdictions that do define cities in law, not all use the same definition.
This not only can vary from country to country, but even within the same
country (for example, in the USA, the state of Tennessee doesn't define wh
2011/1/19 Phil! Gold :
> * Steve Bennett [2011-01-19 15:17 +1100]:
>> I suggest we investigate something like a general prominence=* tag,
>> with values of 1-10.
>
> I wouldn't be opposed to this, but I keep thinking a two-tiered system
> like the Ranally City Rating System[0] might be a better ap
* Steve Bennett [2011-01-19 15:17 +1100]:
> I suggest we investigate something like a general prominence=* tag,
> with values of 1-10.
I wouldn't be opposed to this, but I keep thinking a two-tiered system
like the Ranally City Rating System[0] might be a better approach. You'd
have one axis for
2011/1/19 Pieren :
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>>
> Why instead of "prominence", we don't call it "font_size" ? (which is what
> it is at the end)
no, that would be too few: it is also (maybe mostly) about _when_ to
display a settlement's name, and to determine layer
2011/1/19 John Smith :
> On 19 January 2011 14:17, Steve Bennett wrote:
> The problem here is subject v objective tagging, in terms of airports
> this can be objective stated based on international flights a day and
> the same with cities, if you want to indicate population tag
> population, take
> On 19 January 2011 16:49, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> atlases etc. A town of 50,000 would barely even rate a mention in
>> France, whereas that's pretty big for Australia. And a town like Eucla
>> in the nullarbor (pop 50) has very high prominence as it's the only
>> place for many miles with accomm
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> I suggest we investigate something like a general prominence=* tag,
> with values of 1-10. Define some defaults, like:
>
> 1
> 2 Hamlet
> 3
> 4 Village
> 5
> 6 Town
> 7 National capital (if not bigger)
> 8
> 9 City
> 10
>
>
Why instead of "p
On 19 January 2011 17:34, wrote:
> Literally, you are right. In the scuba world rebreather diving and snorkle
> diving are a part of what scuba divers do.
Erm no...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuba_diving
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snorkling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebreather
There is
On 19 January 2011 16:49, Steve Bennett wrote:
> atlases etc. A town of 50,000 would barely even rate a mention in
> France, whereas that's pretty big for Australia. And a town like Eucla
> in the nullarbor (pop 50) has very high prominence as it's the only
> place for many miles with accommodatio
13 matches
Mail list logo
