[Tagging] geology taggin?

2010-11-11 Thread Xan
hi, Is there any tag for tagging geology of the ground: for example that it's formed by clay, or by volcanic rocks...? Thanks a lot, Xan PS: Please Ccme. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tag

Re: [Tagging] Changing tags...

2010-11-11 Thread Matthias Meißer
Am 11.11.2010 17:43, schrieb John Smith: it's about not having 2 values for the same type object Yes this would be nice but on the other hand it's not that a big problem. BTW as you might noticed there is the upcoming healthcare proposal, that will move amenity=doctors to healthcare=doctor ;)

Re: [Tagging] landuse for arboretum

2010-11-11 Thread Craig Wallace
On 11/11/2010 02:18, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Richard Welty wrote: perhaps: landuse=botanical_garden collection=arboretum|fruticetum|viticetum|pinetum|... I'd prefer keeping landuse values at a minimum, and using subtags where necessary. For example landuse=re

Re: [Tagging] landuse for arboretum

2010-11-11 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/11/11 Nathan Edgars II : > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ulf Lamping > wrote: >> beside, that I had to ask leo what conservation means and I'm still not >> sure. Don't be too generic with tags. > > landuse=conservation means that the primary use of the land is to > conserve natural resour

Re: [Tagging] landuse for arboretum

2010-11-11 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/11/11 Richard Welty : > > landuse=botanical_garden is too specific for landuse IMHO. There is already a proposal for a botanical_garden subtype: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Garden_specification I agree that leisure is not a good key (similar to tourism). cheers, Ma

Re: [Tagging] Changing tags...

2010-11-11 Thread John Smith
On 12 November 2010 02:33, wrote: > instead about arguing about what's right/wrong it would be more wise to add > both and mark this significant difference. This isn't about right and wrong, it's about not having 2 values for the same type object, should we add a 3rd value for physician, and ma

Re: [Tagging] Changing tags...

2010-11-11 Thread Craig Wallace
On 11/11/2010 16:03, John Smith wrote: Erm shouldn't the data be fixed to match the documentation, rather than changing the documentation in this instance? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:amenity&oldid=557169&diff=next It was in Map Features as amenity=doc

Re: [Tagging] Changing tags...

2010-11-11 Thread digi_c
Hi, instead about arguing about what's right/wrong it would be more wise to add both and mark this significant difference. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/amenity=doctors http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/amenity=doctor Few days ago this was IMHO right: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/in

[Tagging] Changing tags...

2010-11-11 Thread John Smith
Erm shouldn't the data be fixed to match the documentation, rather than changing the documentation in this instance? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:amenity&oldid=557169&diff=next ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@op

Re: [Tagging] landuse for arboretum

2010-11-11 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > beside, that I had to ask leo what conservation means and I'm still not > sure. Don't be too generic with tags. landuse=conservation means that the primary use of the land is to conserve natural resources (in this case trees). Often it's land

Re: [Tagging] landuse for arboretum

2010-11-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
Am 11.11.2010 03:34, schrieb John Smith: On 11 November 2010 12:18, Nathan Edgars II wrote: I'd prefer keeping landuse values at a minimum, and using subtags where necessary. For example landuse=residential something=apartments, not landuse=apartments. Would landuse=conservation work for an arb