On 04/08/2010 21:19, Daniel Tremblay wrote:
I buy Dave's comment (see below).
Forget about the cycleway and bicycle tags and lets develop a
"shoulder" set of tag then (which was, in the first place, the subject
of this discussion). Mostly informative and not taken into
consideration within t
You can drive on some cycle lanes (and walk on some cycle tracks), so
I wouldn't advise using exclusivity as a defining criterion for using
the cycleway tag myself. But so long as your tagging is clear, it
doesn't really matter.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Daniel Tremblay wrote:
> I
I buy Dave's comment (see below).
Forget about the cycleway and bicycle tags and lets develop a "shoulder" set
of tag then (which was, in the first place, the subject of this
discussion). Mostly informative and not taken into consideration within the
opencyclemap project.
You know, after a third
On 03/08/2010 14:18, Daniel Tremblay wrote:
Yes, I can bike on normal lane and I do it. I don't like however to
find myself on a 90km/h road with no shoulders. This is the kind of
situation I would like to avoid when preparing my trip. This is why
the shoulder indicator would be usefull IMO
I take the cycleway tag to be a statement of how it looks to a middling cyclist:
is there a cycle track
is there a cycle (or in some places a bus, taxi and cycle) lane
is there a shoulder
is it uncomfortably narrow or quite wide
has someone put a series of markings in the gutter, to encourage
moto
