2010/5/12 Craig Wallace :
> On 12/05/2010 14:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
>
> I don't think barrier=swing_gate is really needed. Its still a type of
> gate, so it should just be tagged barrier=gate. Maybe plus something
On 12/05/2010 14:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I set up a page (Draft) for additional barrier-values. If you want to
> contribute I will be glad.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
I don't think barrier=swing_gate is really needed. Its still a type of
ga
On 13 May 2010 00:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are
>> trying to make a well sued highway tagging scheme redundant.
>
>
> ? This is a work-in-progress draft. I don't want to make anything redundant.
Perhaps I was too succinct,
2010/5/12 John Smith :
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
>
> Why not just start using these values?
I'm already using them
> The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are
> trying to make a well sued highway tagging scheme redundan
On 12 May 2010 23:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I set up a page (Draft) for additional barrier-values. If you want to
> contribute I will be glad.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
Why not just start using these values?
The whole proposal seems pretty
I set up a page (Draft) for additional barrier-values. If you want to
contribute I will be glad.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.opens
