Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-10-30 Thread Randy
Ed Hillsman wrote: >I would welcome any suggestions you have on how to deal with the open- >building situations, the student center, or shade. Yes, in a way, these >are minor, even trivial situations, but they contribute to the quality of >the local environment, and it would be good to be abl

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] NY Bicycle Routes

2009-10-30 Thread Sam Vekemans
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Richard Welty wrote: > On 10/30/09 6:59 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote: > >> Hi, >> how are you tagging state-wide cycle routes? >> >> I know we haven >> lcn= for local cycle routes (named& not named) >> rcn=for regional cycle routes (ie metro area) >> >> then there's >>

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-10-30 Thread Ed Hillsman
I've come to this discussion late, because the tagging listserv is relatively new, and I haven't been monitoring it regularly. I don't have anything like a definitive suggestion to Randy's original problem or the variants added to it in the subsequent discussion, but I'd like to add somethi

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-10-30 Thread Randy
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >2009/10/30 Pieren > >>On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Randy >> >>wrote: >>>Possibly just "building=roof" >>>would work (not my idea, someone else suggested it). >> >>I have a much bigger preference to "building=roof" or "building=cover" >>on the element on the top i

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] NY Bicycle Routes

2009-10-30 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi, how are you tagging state-wide cycle routes? I know we have lcn= for local cycle routes (named & not named) rcn=for regional cycle routes (ie metro area) then there's ncn=for nation wide but there's no scn (state cycle network) or pcn (province cycle network) in Quebec we have a state-wide n

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-10-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/10/30 Pieren > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Randy > wrote: > > Possibly just "building=roof" > > would work (not my idea, someone else suggested it). > > I have a much bigger preference to "building=roof" or "building=cover" > on the element on the top instead of some attribute on some

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-10-30 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Anthony wrote: > Splitting the building into two parts, one at layer=0, touching the > parking area, and one at layer=1, encompassing both the area next to > and under the parking area, is another solution.  It's similar to what > we'd do with a highway when we wan

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-10-30 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Pieren wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Randy wrote: >> Possibly just "building=roof" >> would work (not my idea, someone else suggested it). > > I have a much bigger preference to "building=roof" or "building=cover" > on the element on the top instead o

Re: [Tagging] Highway property proposal "covered=yes"

2009-10-30 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Randy wrote: > Possibly just "building=roof" > would work (not my idea, someone else suggested it). I have a much bigger preference to "building=roof" or "building=cover" on the element on the top instead of some attribute on some hypothetical element below . Add