Re: [sysvinit] Re: Build failure with selinux enabled

2010-03-23 Thread Werner Fink
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 09:19:37AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Petter Reinholdtsen] > > The current svn source fail to build with SE linux enabled. > > I investigated some more, and the MNT_DETACH was introduced after > glibc 2.7, which is the version in Debian Lenny on my laptop. It is

Re: PAM support? (Was: [sysvinit] Re: ?New sysvinit version 2.89dsf?)

2010-03-23 Thread Dr. Werner Fink
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 07:37:09PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Looking at the sysvinit bugs in Debian, I came across > http://bugs.debian.org/68621 > again, asking for PAM support in > sulogin. This sound like a good idea to me. Werner, what is your > view on this? AFAICS from the patch

Re: PAM support? (Was: [sysvinit] Re: ?New sysvinit version 2.89dsf?)

2010-03-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:45:05PM +0100, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 07:37:09PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Looking at the sysvinit bugs in Debian, I came across > > http://bugs.debian.org/68621 > again, asking for PAM support in > > sulogin. This sound like a good

Re: PAM support? (Was: [sysvinit] Re: ?New sysvinit version 2.89dsf?)

2010-03-23 Thread Dr. Werner Fink
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:02:53PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:45:05PM +0100, Dr. Werner Fink wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 07:37:09PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > Looking at the sysvinit bugs in Debian, I came across > > > http://bugs.debian.org/6