(by
who?) if I had only Infiniband remote mounts ?
So my question would revolve around the above points
Can you help me figuring out the correct way to see those concepts ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
strategies ?
Thanks
--
Thomas HUMMEL
My question was that silly ? ;-)
--
Thomas HUMMEL
passive target will be pulled in, correct ? So before ordering
around it one can make sure some unit pulls the checkpoint ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
On 15/02/2022 18:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Di, 15.02.22 17:30, Thomas HUMMEL (thomas.hum...@pasteur.fr) wrote:
A passive unit is a sync point that should be pulled in by the service
that actually needs it to operate correctly. hence: ask the question whether
networkd/NetworkManager
which only the provider know about ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
) always work
Can you help me figuring in what direction I should look, if it is
systemd related at all ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
On 13/07/2022 00:35, Silvio Knizek wrote:
Am Dienstag, dem 12.07.2022 um 18:55 +0200 schrieb Thomas HUMMEL:
Hi,
Hello,
thanks for your answer
first of all, no need for /sys in /etc/fstab. /sys will _always_ be
mounted by systemd.
Ok. This must be put by our image generating tool
ike to understand what's failing
in my original naive setting (tmpfiles or service).
Thanks again anyway.
--
Thomas HUMMEL
-July/048100.html
So I rolled back to a service unit and even so I did have to order it
After= a late (custom) target
None of this was satisfactory but I did not manage to find out what
happened.
Thanks
--
Thomas HUMMEL
.
I agree though that tmpfiles seems to be the most elegant way in general
to perform such things.
Thanks.
--
Thomas HUMMEL
> On 9/9/22 18:09, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
Hello,
maybe referring to
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-January/047342.html
would help clarify ?
--
TH
ng or at least how can the
behavior seem to change with what seem a rollback to the initial state ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
> Is there any other place where the specific ns <-> interface is
persited or stored or is this global updating all there is ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
s they're not provided on the provile (yes it is green but
lists no ipv4.dns property)
$ nmcli -f GENERAL.NM-MANAGED device show tun0
GENERAL.NM-MANAGED: yes
$ nmcli -f ipv4.dns connection show tun0
ipv4.dns:
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
dispatcher
mechanism to run resolvectl at the right time without touching
resolvconf ? This would still be a workaround though.
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
_INTERFACE" -o "$ACTION" != "up" ] && exit 0
[ "$INTERFACE" == "$F5_INTERFACE" -a "$ACTION" == "up" ] && echo
"$SCRIPT_NAME: adding $F5_INTERFACE nameservers to systemd-resolved
configuration"
/usr/bin/resolvectl dns $F5_INTERFACE $F5_NAMESERVER_1 $F5_NAMESERVER_2
|| { echo "Pb running resolvectl" ; usage 1 ; }
exit 0
--
Thomas HUMMEL
ances LOADED state to not-found or will it do
something to the running instances ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
So success or failure of the mount process does not seem to be involved
in the ordering dep, or does it ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
On 2/6/24 17:06, Silvio Knizek wrote:
Hi Thomas,
RequiresMountsFor=3D should be your friend. It just takes a space-
separated list of paths and does all the other stuff by itself.
Hello, thanks for your reply.
Actually RequiresMountsFor is not what I need because I'd have to point
some fi
On 2/7/24 11:50, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Still I cannot understand where the Requires= comes in
remote-fs.target unit as doc for special target only describes a Wants=
dep added by systemd-fstab-generator in the case of auto mounts.
Well, forget about that Wants= dep which is to the mount
ice (After= comes for free)
But then if some such .mount units would get unmonted remote-fs.target's
Requires= would not deactivate remote-fs.target and my
service would in turn not be deactivated
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
he real root fs a static
network config referencing this device name initially set with ifname=
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
On 9/16/24 2:31 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
Hi!
I think this should be fine. ifname= uses udev to rename the device and
udev will not rename the device later again.
Lukas
Ok.
Thanks for your answer.
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
how ?
Note : as a Centos 8.1 standard install I've got of course the
systemd-hostnamed service "enabled" (actually static) but I did not ran
it myself and NetworkManager (hostname-mode=none) does not manage the
transient hostname. It only uses this service as a proxy to get the
On 4/20/20 5:10 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
At this point, the transient hostname is unchanged (which is what I'd
expect) as seen with hostnamectl above or directly asking dbus:
[root@maestro-1000 ~]# dbus-send --print-reply --system
--dest=org.freedesktop.hostname1 /org/freedesktop/host
On 4/27/20 11:16 AM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Actually, I noticed this is true when NetworkManager's hostname-mode
setting is set to 'none'. If set to 'dhcp', the transient hostname
aligns instantly to the new static one.
Sorry I may be wrong on this one as I can not rep
On 4/27/20 11:51 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
Hello, thanks for your answer.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 6:17 PM Thomas HUMMEL <mailto:thomas.hum...@pasteur.fr>> wrote:
1. why does the transient hostname change while I stated --static only
while running hostnamectl ?
2. why
f
any fits in either passive or active units.
I see that local-fs.target can be pulled in by sysinit.target and that
dracut-pre-pivot.target can pull in remote-fs.target but to me those 2
targets would rather fit the passive unit category ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
_
id try to discuss this in the networkmanager list here :
in particular starting from this post (the post above just show how much
I was confused)
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2020-April/msg00031.html
of this thread
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2020-
On 4/28/20 5:36 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
3) regarding local-fs dans remote-fs targets : I'm not really sure if
any fits in either passive or active units.
Hello again,
regarding local-fs.target : is it legit for a custom service unit to
pull it in with a Before=local-fs.target (no Wan
On 5/5/20 5:15 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
-> this seems to be like an actual run and not only the queuing of a job
into the transaction which would be discarded afterwards when the cycle
is discovered ?
Ok I figure out this one : I was confusing the
systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service from ini
On 5/5/20 5:27 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
On 5/5/20 5:15 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
-> this seems to be like an actual run and not only the queuing of a
job into the transaction which would be discarded afterwards when the
cycle is discovered ?
Ok I figure out this one : I was confusing
On 5/5/20 7:41 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
a) Before= does not pull anything anywhere.
Yes I know sorry I did not use the correct term. I did not mean that.
b) as you already found, by default every service is ordered after
local-fs.target. You need DefalutDependencies=no if you want to star
On 5/4/20 3:57 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
but
hostnamectl --static set-hostname 'static' where current static hostname
is already 'static' then transient hostname is never set.
What do you think about it ?
Hello,
am I wrong on this one ?
Thanks for your he
On 5/6/20 11:51 AM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
On 5/4/20 3:57 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
but
hostnamectl --static set-hostname 'static' where current static
hostname is already 'static' then transient hostname is never set.
Hello,
am I wrong on this one ?
Hello, sorry to i
re out why the difference ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On 14/05/2020 07:35, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
It does not match your graphs. Your service is apparently ordered after
network-online.target (not after network.target) and startup is most
certainly initiated before rsyslog.service. Not hat it explains anything
but at least you need to provide acc
Hello,
the point below has been buried at the end one of a previous thread. So
feel free to ignore it if you find it irrelevant.
With systemd-239 on linux 4.18.0 (CentOS 8.1), why does hostnamectl
--static set-hostname instantly sets the transient hostname to
*only* when is not the curren
On 16/05/2020 08:16, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
15.05.2020 12:57, Thomas HUMMEL пишет:
In other words : is it a bad practice to order a home made service
before remote-fs-pre.target ?
Why would it be? The very reason remote-fs-pre.target was added is to
allow services to be reliably started
On 16/06/2020 10:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mo, 25.05.20 16:19, Thomas HUMMEL (thomas.hum...@pasteur.fr) wrote:
Hello,
the point below has been buried at the end one of a previous thread. So feel
free to ignore it if you find it irrelevant.
With systemd-239 on linux 4.18.0 (CentOS
(which seems normal considering the dependency but weird as I did not
have any message about it at the last start command)
# ls -l /run/systemd/journal/syslog
ls: cannot access '/run/systemd/journal/syslog': No such file or directory
What am I missing ?
Note: rsyslog service is of T
s unit will not be
started. "
That's what I meant and though it does seems so at boot, I seemed to
experience the contrary when manually starting rsyslog.service...
So I must like you said misunderstand something...
Thanks for yo
nces but, again, without
the After= having any effect, it should not matter, should it ?
So I'm still convinces I'm missing something obvious...
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@li
ter reboot, run 4 ou 5 systemctl start
rsyslog.service and only the last one succeeds corresponds to this "race
condition" you described above ?
Thanks a lot for your explanations. Makes more sense now.
--
Thomas HUMMEL
___
sys
n ID_NET_NAME has been set in a
previous step ? What was the use of the biosdevname stop then ?
finally, what does "If the kernel claims that the name it has set for a
device is predictable" mean
(https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.link.html#) ?
And what is
Thanks for your answer
On 8/11/20 5:43 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:12 PM Thomas HUMMEL
On RHEL/CentOS 8 biosdevname naming is not used unless it is explicitly
enabled on the kernel command line using biosdevname=1.
Indeed I've read the udev rule too fas
er gets lingered there is no such error
message (which makes me think about the creation of the crond session
through the systemd --user instance running a job)
Thanks for your help and sorry for the confusion
--
Thomas HUMMEL
___
systemd-devel mailing
ning its PAM session.
Sorry I don't get it : what service exactly is started ? crond opening
its PAM session does not cause a systemd --user to be instanciated or
does it ? I thought the only way to have a systemd --user was through
the creation via pam_systemd notifying systemd-logind at a use
to do with sd-pam or
does it ?
Ok so it's this service (systemd --user) which uses the systemd-user
PAM
service name ? Passed to the generic sd-pam worker ? Correct ?
Yes.
You said above that it was only at the creation of
ation ?) such a rule in
access.conf is not needed for let's say a ssh login first session ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
On 13/10/2020 20:05, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 13:09:43 +0200, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Ok, so for instance, on my debian, when I see:
user@10
On 14/10/2020 13:24, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:42 AM Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Hello,
thanks for your answer. It's getting clearer.
Still : why would the user crond runs on behalf of needs to be allowed
in access.conf to access the systemd-user service
On 10/14/20 8:13 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
And both sshd and crond include pam_access in their configuration?
Yes, crond has the same session incude of password-auth.
Thanks
--
Thomas HUMMEL
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel
.conf whereas crond semmes to need it (givent no systemd --user
was previously running in both cases) ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/sy
signed : when instructed to create a session, it also start the
user@.service just for the user to be able to use its own systemd
instance (which in my case of user crontab is not used) ?
I all of my guesses are correct I still have to figure out the exact
problem I had when the user (who had a
e")
If I'm correct, this would be the reason more than the pid 1 direct
parenthood you mentionned. Otherwise, in the standard services (not
using PAMName=) case this would work only with the type=forking
services, wouldn't it ?
Tha
On 11/28/24 7:56 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 3:50 PM Thomas HUMMEL
wrote:
Hello,
coming back to the topic (sorry, I had an actual physical issue with the
device which blurred my analysis):
1. On a system where /dev/nvme0, /dev/nvme0n1 and /dev/nvme0n1p1 files
On 11/25/24 3:07 PM, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
On 11/25/24 2:50 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 4:39 PM Thomas HUMMEL
wrote:
Hello,
I've got a somehow silly question:
Am I right to think that a service unit I wrote meant to format and
mount a localdisk at boot havin
aces) to get it. I'll dig further myself.
Thanks again for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
On 11/25/24 2:50 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 4:39 PM Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
Hello,
I've got a somehow silly question:
Am I right to think that a service unit I wrote meant to format and
mount a localdisk at boot having the following properties :
Wants=local-fs.t
evice
(/dev/nvme0) would not be there yet ?
If so, would adding After=systemd-udevd suffice ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
My use case would be to express a dynamic activation and order
dependency on a device name known only at boot time.
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
On 1/16/25 4:29 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 16.01.25 11:31, Thomas HUMMEL (thomas.hum...@pasteur.fr) wrote:
Hello,
Is the %i (or %I) specifier supposed to be valid for a template service unit
for the Require= and After= directives ?
It does not seem so in my tests
Documentation
On 1/17/25 11:20 AM, Tomasz Pala wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 19:29:28 +0100, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
I thought in my case it did not work because journald showed a
dependency error but, with systemd on debug mode I could see it was an
For the future: if you need to see expanded (%s) and
n actual root)
2. would then initialramfs output also be forwarded to syslog ? Only in
debug mode ?
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
and sorry for the slow catch up I showed in
my understanding.
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
ared of read data because I thought reading from /proc/kmsg was the
same as calling syslog with SYSLOG_ACTION_READ command under the hood
and man states:
"Bytes read from the log disappear from the log buffer"
Actually reading rsyslogd source, it seems to just read from an fd it
got
ut how it works.
Thanks for your help
--
Thomas HUMMEL
HPC Group
Institut PASTEUR
Paris, FRANCE
68 matches
Mail list logo
