On Mon, 23.07.12 14:57, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On 07/20/2012 12:08 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> >we found this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807885 and
> >we already invested some effort to introducing new timeout types. We
> >have a patch prepared intro
On 07/20/2012 12:08 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
we found this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807885 and
we already invested some effort to introducing new timeout types. We
have a patch prepared introducing new service timeout types, namely
TimoutStartSec and TimeoutStopSec.
I a
Hi everyone,
we found this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807885 and
we already invested some effort to introducing new timeout types. We
have a patch prepared introducing new service timeout types, namely
TimoutStartSec and TimeoutStopSec. Semantic would be as follows. Old
timeou