On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:45:09AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > I've now added a paragraph about this change to NEWS.
> >
> > Not sure what to do in the Fedora package though.
>
> Why not do the same as in the Arch packag
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> I've now added a paragraph about this change to NEWS.
>
> Not sure what to do in the Fedora package though.
Why not do the same as in the Arch package? Are there any drawbacks? I
thought that should cover backwards compatibili
I've now added a paragraph about this change to NEWS.
Not sure what to do in the Fedora package though.
This kind of seemingly-gratuitous backwards-incompatible change should
be done more carefuly and visibly.
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
sys
'Twas brillig, and Tom Gundersen at 23/02/14 14:33 did gyre and gimble:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:12:56PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> To clarify things:
>>>
>>> 1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules
>>
>> We (Arch) m
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:12:56PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> To clarify things:
>>
>> 1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules
>
> We (Arch) made a decision back when the persistent naming was added to
> make it opt-in by
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:12:56PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> To clarify things:
>
> 1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules
We (Arch) made a decision back when the persistent naming was added to
make it opt-in by masking 80-net-name-slot.rules in /etc. Now, if the
209 upgrade
'Twas brillig, and Jason A. Donenfeld at 21/02/14 16:12 did gyre and gimble:
> To clarify things:
>
> 1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules
> 2. freedesktop.org wiki followed suit and added that suggestion
> 3. Others have said elsewhere that the proper way to do this is
> actually t
To clarify things:
1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules
2. freedesktop.org wiki followed suit and added that suggestion
3. Others have said elsewhere that the proper way to do this is
actually to override 99-default.link instead.
4. Gentoo went with number 3.
Now:
5. Can numbers 1
On 21/02/14 17:37, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 21/02/14 13:58 did
> gyre and gimble:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Hey guys,
This commit c
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 21/02/14 13:58 did
gyre and gimble:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> This commit caught me by surprise:
>>>
>>> http://git.zx2c4
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > This commit caught me by surprise:
> >
> > http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8
> >
> > It wasn't in the
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> This commit caught me by surprise:
>
> http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8
>
> It wasn't in the NEWS or the mailing list post for 209, so when
> updating I encountered a bit
Hey guys,
This commit caught me by surprise:
http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8
It wasn't in the NEWS or the mailing list post for 209, so when
updating I encountered a bit of unexpected behavior. I see that I can
disable persistent names using ne
13 matches
Mail list logo
