On 02/18/2014 11:05 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 17.02.2014 21:27, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
As soon as a bigger coredump (about 500 MB) is to be stored, the whole
system slows down significantly. Seems like storing such big amounts of
data takes pretty long and is a very CPU hungry process...
I
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 17.02.2014 21:27, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
>> As soon as a bigger coredump (about 500 MB) is to be stored, the whole
>> system slows down significantly. Seems like storing such big amounts of
>> data takes pretty long and is a very CPU hun
Am 17.02.2014 21:27, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
> As soon as a bigger coredump (about 500 MB) is to be stored, the whole
> system slows down significantly. Seems like storing such big amounts of
> data takes pretty long and is a very CPU hungry process...
I completely agree. Since the kernel ignores t
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Jan Alexander Steffens
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Manuel Reimer
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> if a bigger application crashes with coredump, then systemd-coredump seems
>> to have a few problems with that.
>>
>> At first, there is the 767 MB limitation w
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Manuel Reimer
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if a bigger application crashes with coredump, then systemd-coredump seems
> to have a few problems with that.
>
> At first, there is the 767 MB limitation which just "drops" all bigger
> coredumps.
>
> But even below this limit it
Hello,
if a bigger application crashes with coredump, then systemd-coredump
seems to have a few problems with that.
At first, there is the 767 MB limitation which just "drops" all bigger
coredumps.
But even below this limit it seems to be impossible to store coredumps.
I did a few tries an
