Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v196

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:20AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:29:53AM +0100, Henrik Grindal Bakken wrote: > > > Any ideas? > > > > I'm running 196 just fine on a 3.0 vendor kernel, so it's not a > > universal problem. I also use getty on the serial port, with no local

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v196

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:29:53AM +0100, Henrik Grindal Bakken wrote: > Thierry Reding writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Would anyone know why the latest releases no longer work on 3.1 kernels? > > I tried to update from 187 to 196 today and booting the system on a > &

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v196

Hi, Would anyone know why the latest releases no longer work on 3.1 kernels? I tried to update from 187 to 196 today and booting the system on a vendor kernel based on 3.1.10 no longer gets to the boot prompt. It hangs somewhere near where it should actually be spawning a getty on the serial port.

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v44

* Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/19/2012 07:59 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > * Kay Sievers wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:14, Koen Kooi > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Op

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v44

* Kay Sievers wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:14, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Op 16 mrt. 2012, om 02:40 heeft Lennart Poettering het volgende geschreven: > > > >> Heya, > >> > >> this is primarily a bugfix release (but does include a couple of new > >> things) and might be very likely the version

[systemd-devel] Extracting a coredump from the journal

Hi, I've just had a service crash on one of my systems that runs with systemd 43 so I had a look at the output from 'systemctl status' and looked through the journal to find an entry saying that the process dumped core. I can also confirm that the journal has a coredump entry (judging by the verbo

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] configure.ac: fix typo in distro help string

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding --- configure.ac |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 62e8cdf..87d2211 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_XSLTPROC, test x"$XSLTPROC&

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] gperf: Include missing.h.

* Thierry Reding wrote: > Older GNU C libraries don't define RLIMIT_RTTIME, so including the > missing.h is required to fix the build. [...] So I just noticed that Koen already posted the same patch before. I should have looked more carefully. Thierry pgpoCK1rD2KM6.pgp Descr

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] gperf: Include missing.h.

Older GNU C libraries don't define RLIMIT_RTTIME, so including the missing.h is required to fix the build. --- src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 b/src/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 index 650f444

Re: [systemd-devel] minimal-uclibc: systemd fails with `src/manager.c:257:42: error: 'EPOLL_CLOEXEC' undeclared (first use in this function)`

* Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear OE folks, > > > task compile of `systemd_git.bb` fails with the following error message > using `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`. Using `minimal`, > i. e. EGLIBC, works. > > […] > | CC src/libsystemd_core_la-manager.lo > | s

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] build-sys: distribute introspect.awk

--- Makefile.am |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 7cd6787..eeb6ff9 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ EXTRA_DIST = \ units/f...@.service.in \ units/fsck-root.service.in \ u

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] build-sys: fix out-of-tree build

The introspect AWK script is located in the source tree, which is not necessarily the same as the build tree, so prepend $(srcdir). --- Makefile.am |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 2fa6ecb..7cd6787 100644 --- a/Makefile.am ++

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Allow tests to be disabled.

This patch adds a --disable-tests option to the configure script in order to remove the build-dependency on gtk+-3.0. --- Makefile.am |6 +- configure.ac | 14 ++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 41ff37c..e13787a

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: allow building without libnotify

* Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:36, Thierry Reding > > wrote: > >> This patch makes the libnotify dependency optional and doesn't build the > >> systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: allow building without libnotify

This patch makes the libnotify dependency optional and doesn't build the systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent utility if libnotify is not available. Since libnotify >= 0.7.0 requires gtk+-3.0, this patch may be useful for environments where upgrading Gtk is not an option. --- Makefile.am |6

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Allow cross-compilation.

* Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Tue, 23.11.10 21:12, Thierry Reding (thierry.red...@avionic-design.de) > > wrote: > > > >> When cross-compiling systemd, the introspection XML files fail

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Allow cross-compilation.

When cross-compiling systemd, the introspection XML files fail to be generated because the systemd host binary is not executable. This patch works around this by putting the introspection XML data into separate ELF sections and extracting them from the binary when generating the XML files. The ext

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Allow cross-compilation.

When cross-compiling systemd, the introspection XML files fail to be generated because the systemd host binary is not executable. This patch works around this by looking for the systemd binary in the path of the build host and run that instead of the host binary created during the build process. A