On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:22 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 at 21:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > I recently added systemd v256 to Gentoo's ebuild repo. While testing
> > the upgrade process from v255, I have run into an issue.
> >
> >
I recently added systemd v256 to Gentoo's ebuild repo. While testing
the upgrade process from v255, I have run into an issue.
After the upgrade, my KDE Plasma session stopped working, and I was
unable to execute a reboot from the GUI.
Looking at the journal, I see several messages like this one:
Ah, to clarify, I'm talking about app-specific servers not Linux
system services, so dbus isn't really relevant (what would it be used
for?). The sort of programs that tend to be packaged with Docker
today, or deployed using AWS Lambda or just copied up to the server.
For example a typical business
Sorry, by "apps" I meant anything not supplied by OS developers. In
this context, servers e.g. custom web app servers. I do currently run
some of those with DynamicUser=1 and similar.
> As long as the tool updating the disk image creates the new one under
> a temporary name, and then replaces the
> There's currently no mechanism for that. File an RFE issue.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/26647
> In the "Portable Services" concept we currently assume you update the
> disk image ("DDI") the service is on, and then simply restart the
> service while leaving the socket around.
I'v
I see. So basically you have to keep the service running across the upgrade
and then wait for it to shut down due to inactivity, then be restarted by
systemd to make the update apply. Or alternatively you could make the app
detect that it's been updated, stop accepting new connections, finish
servi
for servers that can handle this it would
make upgrades entirely transparent.
thanks,
-mike
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 5:31 PM Thomas Köller wrote:
>
> I cannot start the 'ssh' command from a systemd service. A very simple
> service file demonstrates the problem:
Your test service works fine for me on Gentoo Linux.
I would guess execution is being blocked by something like AppArmor or SEL
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:12 AM Thomas Burghout
wrote:
>
> On 18.01.20233 04:06, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > On 17.01.2023 18:28, Thomas Burghout wrote:
> > > inet 169.254.146.171/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope link eth0
> >
> > Is it output from the correct system? Because address is different
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 10:55 AM Marcel Menzel wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
> after switching from radvd to systemd-networkd for router advertisements, I
> noticed my Android device losing IPv6 connection after a while and not
> displaying any IPv6 Addresses anymore in the network overview.
>
> I am
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 9:41 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 00:48 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hi Wol,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:02 AM Wol wrote:
> > >
> > > On 07/04/2022 17:47, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > &g
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:34 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 12:54 PM Pascal wrote:
> >
> > not really in the sense that qemu-nbd launches and immediately gives the
> > hand back to the script that called it.
> > the script ends positively and
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 12:54 PM Pascal wrote:
>
> not really in the sense that qemu-nbd launches and immediately gives the hand
> back to the script that called it.
> the script ends positively and qemu-nbd is killed by systemd because it is
> considered to be garbage left behind by the script.
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:51 AM Pascal wrote:
> it is not strictly speaking a long-running process but it is a child who
> survives his father and who is killed when his father stops living
> successfully ! what a strange world these children live in... ;-)
Sorry, I missed this last line. Are
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:51 AM Pascal wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> is it possible to influence the killmode of a script launched by an udev rule
> ?
>
> I have a udev rule that starts a script that itself starts qemu-nbd that gets
> killed once the script is finished (qemu-nbd links a block device to an
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 2:53 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 at 19:11, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 18:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2021-09-15 at 16:06 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 13:36 +0200, Lennart Poettering wr
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:18 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 10:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mi, 06.04.22 11:24, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
> >
> > > We are not likely to require merging of / and /usr for the foreseeable
>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 4:59 AM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Mi, 06.04.22 11:24, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
> > We are not likely to require merging of / and /usr for the foreseeable
> > future. We are a "rolling release" distro and basically ne
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:07 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of our spring cleaning effort, we are considering when to drop
> support for split/unmerged-usr filesystem layouts.
>
> A build-time warning was added last year:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/9afd5e7b975e8051c0
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 8:54 PM Jonathan Kelly wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in trying to compile unicon programming language - I'm on arch linux ...
>
> Linux arch 5.15.10-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:17:37
> + x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> ... I'm getting this error
>
> make[2]: Entering directo
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 7:36 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> Heya!
>
> Some of the systemd developers have been discussing switching
> systemd's crypto libraries to be exclusively OpenSSL 3.0, and drop
> support for older OpenSSL versions, as well as any GNUTLS/libgcrypt
> support. As you might h
day's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Is `kernel-install` called automatically? (Ian Pilcher)
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ian Pilcher
> To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 08:58:46 -0500
> Subject:
I may not have understood correctly, but it seems that after `bootcl
install`, `kernel-install` is _not_ called automatically; neither
initially, nor after any system kernel update.
Is this correct? And if so can anyone help with the reasoning behind this
or status of this issue?
To clarify: I wo
Looks like the cable modem allocates itself a /60. There are some
WiFi devices that grab a few /64(s), for some unknown reason. There
should be at least one /63 if not a /62 available. This is an
Espressobin, where I modified the device tree to rename the wan
interface. All three ports connect
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:19 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:05 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 09.02.21 um 23:18 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:47 AM Reindl Harald
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:05 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 09.02.21 um 23:18 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:47 AM Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 09.02.21 um 17:13 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:47 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 09.02.21 um 17:13 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:17 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 08.02.21 um 23:42 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> >&
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:17 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 08.02.21 um 23:42 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:31 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>> I think removing this symlink would prevent /sys/fs/fuse/connections
> >>> from being mou
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 2:31 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
> > I think removing this symlink would prevent /sys/fs/fuse/connections
> > from being mounted and the fuse module from being loaded
> > unconditionally on boot
>
> no
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909805#c6
It almost works f
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:01 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 08.02.21 um 18:27 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On So, 07.02.21 22:43, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> >
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909805
> >
> > In response to your actual issue, ignoring all
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:46 AM Francis Moreau wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need
> to create a file starting with "99-" prefix.
>
> This doesn't seem logical to me because the numbers are supposed to
> encode the priority however nothing i
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:43 AM Amit anand wrote:
>
> Hi systemd-devel group,
>
>
> I need to upstream systemd git patch for fixing systemd static code analysis
> warnings.
>
> Can you please suggest me the correct mailgroup to send the git patch or
> relevant web url which have information to
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:05 AM Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003 (Core) with
> php72u-fpm-7.2.30-1.el7.ius.x86_64 version. I am facing the below permission
> denied issue. I also did the below steps
> #cd /run
> #chown -Rc nginx.nginx php-fpm
> chang
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 3:00 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thanks in
> > Advance.
>
> This is probably an issue with the systemd units shipped with php-fpm.
> This would not be an issue for this upstream systemd mailin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:13 AM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Prior to systemd, with the 'hwclock' package installed, a udev rule
> would trigger reading of the RTC and setting the system clock when
> /dev/rtc0 appeared. With systemd running, the script run by that udev
> rule is suppressed, it doesn'
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> > If possible, it would probably be wise to restrict access for pushing
> > new branches like this.
>
> Hmm, how would we do that? Any suggestion? Happy to restrict that, but
> not sure how to do that...
I thought maybe there was a settin
It looks like a branch called "msekletar-security-list-process" was
pushed to the official systemd github repo earlier this month. This
branch probably belongs in msekletar's personal fork instead.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/branches
If possible, it would probably be wise to restrict acce
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:46 AM Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
> Andy Pieters wrote on 08/10/2019 11:41:
> > forget about the stop. that was the context into which I discovered it.
> >
> > I am not saying stop should disable I am saying stop should not accept
> > now and silently ignore it
>
>
> FWIW I'd
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:14 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:02 AM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:50 AM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mi, 15.05.19 15:53, Jeffrey Walton (noloa...@gmail.com)
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:50 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mi, 15.05.19 15:53, Jeffrey Walton (noloa...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > if [[ "$NEEDS_REBOOT" -eq 1 ]]
> > then
> > echo "Scheduling reboot in 10 minutes"
> > reboot -r 10
>
> This syntax is not understood by systemd:
>
> https:
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 1:19 PM tedheadster wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 12:30 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Can you capture register contents at the point of the crash?
> >
> > Does this reproduce in a chroot? Maybe you can trace the whole thing
> > with a debugger. Does the crash reprodu
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:51 AM Stanislav Angelovič
wrote:
>
> Hi systemd-ers,
>
> Having recent systemd sources, how can I build libsystemd.so only?
>
> I was able to build the static version with this:
> meson build/
> ninja -C build version.h
> ninja -C build libsystemd.a
>
> But how can I bui
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:38 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:23 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > On Do, 04.04.19 10:06, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
> >
> > > I pushed this out to our unstable testers yesterday, and rece
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:23 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Do, 04.04.19 10:06, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
> > I pushed this out to our unstable testers yesterday, and received a
> > couple bug reports this morning. I have requested that they be
> &
I pushed this out to our unstable testers yesterday, and received a
couple bug reports this morning. I have requested that they be
forwarded upstream, but wanted to point them out in case that doesn't
happen promptly.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/682492
sys-apps/systemd-242_rc2 boot fails: sd-passwd ta
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:34 AM Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are on systemd 239 and we would like to patch following CVEs
> without jumping to 240.
>
> CVE-2018-16864
> CVE-2018-16865
> CVE-2018-16866
>
> Can someone please help us out and point the commits that we need to
> bac
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:54 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 17.01.19 um 18:51 schrieb Christopher Cox:
> > On 1/17/19 11:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 17.01.19 um 18:17 schrieb Christopher Cox:
> >>> On 1/17/19 11:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Hmm, what kind of processes
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:36 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mo, 14.01.19 10:59, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > since v240 didn't go too well, I would like to suggest that the next one
> > (preferably two) release(s) are bugfix only. Please, consider it.
>
> Well,
The fchmod_opath() function in systemd seems like a hacky workaround
for a limitation in the kernel -- you can't call fchmod() on an fd
opened with O_PATH, and fchmodat() doesn't support the AT_EMPTY_PATH
flag.
Has any attempt been made to add this functionality in the kernel? If
someone has alrea
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:24 PM Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Please do not start telling that it can be done differently. Until SAP
> implements *SUPPORTED* different solution (startup files are maintained
> by SAP installer automatically among other things) using login shell is
> the only supported w
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:57 PM Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > This reverts commit df7caca.
>
> If you reverts df7caca, please also revert b710072 as that breaks cross
> builds.
>
> > The patch df7caca breaks normal build. Let's revert this, as I do not want
> > to revert this every time when
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Kevin Greene wrote:
> I am building libusb, and I want to build it with udev support. I don't need
> to build anything in systemd except udev. Is there a good way to do that?
>
> I'm deploying to machines running Ubuntu 16.04, so I'm targeting systemd
> v229 (which
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 01.02.2018 15:08, Mantas Mikulėnas пишет:
>>>
>>
>> For users outside the "system account" UID range (usually 1–999), a logout
>> will cause systemd to clean up remaining "junk" such as SysV IPC resources.
>
>
> Where is it documented?
In
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.01.2018 um 16:49 schrieb Simon McVittie:
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 at 15:47:21 +0100, Franck Bui wrote:
>>>
>>> Basically, systemd mounts all filesystems listed in /etc/fstab (unless
>>> "noauto" is used) which is good since that's
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Do, 28.12.17 14:07, tedheadster (tedheads...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I am doing regression testing on old hardware. systemd-233 just
>> generated the following error on startup:
>>
>> traps:systemd[1] trap invalid opcode ip:b7d97361 sp
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:49 AM, David Henderson
wrote:
> On 11/1/17, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, David Henderson wrote:
>>> Is there a place to just get the udev code instead of all of systemD?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> I tried looking online, but it appears that the only
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 18:26 David Henderson
> wrote:
>>
>> Good afternoon all! I have been looking for the udev source code to
>> compile the library and utilities and it appears it is bundled in the
>> systemd software. I have run aut
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:38 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 05:19 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:01 AM, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>
> My host is Archlinux, nspawn container is Fedora 26. Kernel is 4.13.3
>
> I can't fully upgrade m
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:01 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> My host is Archlinux, nspawn container is Fedora 26. Kernel is 4.13.3
>
> I can't fully upgrade my container as some files are owned by
> nobody:nobody and can't change to root. An example is filesystems. When
> upgrading, it returns error:
>
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Michał Zegan
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I came across the following:
> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
> call that normally would trigger restart actually triggers sending
> sighup to the init of a namespace, and sigint is sent in case
that in my searching. ConditionHost=
meets my needs and seems cleaner, although that is a nice suggestion
about ConditionPathExists, since it avoids the need to hard-code a
hostname in the service file.
-Mike
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-
ld be great if systemd could log an error message
when the PIDFile is not accessible. It took me hours to realize why systemd
was continually stopping my service immediately after starting it.
Thanks for any advice you can offer.
-Mike Gulick
_
On 05/23/2016 06:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 20.05.16 20:10, Mike Gulick (mike.gul...@mathworks.com) wrote:
Hi systemd-devel,
I'm on Debian Jessie running the default systemd-215. I have a
daemon (running as root, controlled by systemd), whose job it is to
launch on-deman
, but I don't really
understand what's needed, and I can't actually authenticate as the user because
I don't know their password (currently this daemon is root so it doesn't need a
password to switch user).
If there is some kind of shell pipeline, or a wr
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 07:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>>>> I'm happy to move it if others want to utilize
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 03:55 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the
>>> other side, the client that tal
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Nice, thanks for working on this! What's still missing in that is the
> other side, the client that talks to the initctl socket. I have patches
> to remove the initctl bits from the systemd repo, and add a callout from
> systemctl to binaries i
On 18 March 2016 at 17:43, Mike Fleetwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that since approximately udev version 219, opening a whole
> disk device entry read-write, then closing it triggers udev to remove
> and re-create all the partition /dev entries.
>
> Because of th
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18.02.16 20:33, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
>>> wrote:
>
ll me what version introduced this behaviour
(commit(s) would be great) and why? Also I assume that GParted should
run "udevadm settle" to wait for the /dev partition entries to be
re-created.
Thanks,
Mike
[1] test program
/* gcc -o c-test-0005 c-test-0005.c */
#include
#include
#in
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 18.02.16 20:33, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > 1) systemd-initctl (i.e. the /dev/initctl SysV compat support). L
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> 1) systemd-initctl (i.e. the /dev/initctl SysV compat support). Last
>time Debian was still using that, maybe this changed now?
Gentoo allows switching between systemd and openrc (sysvinit) at boot
time, and will continue to do so
ed to systemd-shutdown, however we are using systemctl to reboot, so it
seems the watchdog management cannot be properly passed to systemctl. Any
recommendations on the best way to solve this issue and get rid of this message?
Thanks,
Mike
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:43:24 -0500
> schrieb Mike Gilbert :
>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Kai Krakow
>> wrote:
>> > Am Tue, 8 Dec 2015 01:36:01 +0200
>> > schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas :
>> >
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Tue, 8 Dec 2015 01:36:01 +0200
> schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas :
>
>> What uid does "oracle" have – is it within the system account range
>> (usually 1–999) or user account (1000–)? I wonder if it's the latter,
>> which would mean systemd-logind w
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Since a long time systemd has been shipping with two-way compat
> support for /dev/initctl, and I am tempted to remove it. Before I do
> so, I'd like some input on the relevance of this interface:
Gentoo currently utilizes thi
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 23.06.15 01:21, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>>
>>> We currently considering to stop creating release tar balls.
>>>
>&
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 23.06.15 01:21, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>
>> We currently considering to stop creating release tar balls.
>>
>> For build systems which still require them, they can be created
>> locally from the upstream git repositor
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Make sure the variable set via --with-rootprefix= does not contain a
> trailing slash, so man pages can use entities like "&rootprefix;/lib"
> without ending up having double slashes.
> ---
> configure.ac | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertion
This should also be flagged for backports since the hard-coded
/usr/lib/systemd path will break any initramfs if rootprefix != /usr.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-d
---
Makefile.am| 1 +
src/shared/generator.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index f84a28d..70d4dc0 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ AM_CPPFLAGS = \
-DCATALOG_DATABASE=\"$(catalogstate
When max_use and keep_free are set to the defaults in coredump.conf for
use in non-journal cores, systemd-coredump ignores the settings
altogether and proceeds to fill up all available disk space with coredumps.
'-1 'is used internally inside of coredump.c and coredump-vacuum.c to
denote defau
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou
> ---
> Makefile.am | 4 ++--
> configure.ac | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index 9b769ee..397a71c 100644
> --- a/Makefil
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is it possible to somehow create a service which enables port forwardings on
> my router using upnp? Currently, I guess it is not possible (except maybe
> using ExecPost or ExecPre and the upnpc program). But when my client IP
> chang
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 2015-01-13 00:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:42:38PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>
>>> Happens with top-of-line 720e0be0f00f4a7fee808d1cf60db43970900588.
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>> + make i
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> systemd.pc is currently installed into /usr/share/pkgconfig/, but this
> isn't correct: It contains "libdir" whose value is (possibly)
> architecture specific. E. g. if you configure with
> --libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu (we
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
> bootchart defaults to chaining to /sbin/init, which is sensible,
> but in a pure systemd environment (without systemd-sysvinit)
> will make the machine unbootable.
>
> Change the default through /etc/systemd/bootchart.conf.
> Keep the /
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Here's the next version of systemd, v218:
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-218.tar.xz
Hi Lennart,
It looks like the tarball is missing units/user/systemd-consoled.service.
make[2]: *** No rule to make
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
>> /proc/self/mounts as it should.
>> So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic link /etc/
This reverts commit 0c26bfc3d21fdb3963f1248c237e2f1a33b5566d.
src/core/org.freedesktop.systemd1.policy.in.in depends on values which
are specified at configure time, so we cannot ship the corresponding
policy file in the tarball.
Since we need to regenerate one policy file, we might as well gener
I have noticed that when the 'debug' option is passed on the kernel
command line, it is impossible to override this using the
'systemd.log_level' option.
I also note that passing SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL on the kernel command line
DOES work; the kernel copies this to the environment block for init.
Look
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> But in any case, is there a better way to trigger fsck for ext3/4, and not
> for XFS and Btrfs, based on some information other than fstab fs_passno? If
> systemd knew the root file system type before mounting, it could always issue
> fsck
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 23.06.14 16:11, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
>> > Thanks, but please work with the gcc developers to solve this
>> > generically for all gcc users, instead of work around this limitation in
>> > every individua
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
> wrote:
>> El 21/06/14 01:38, Chase Rayfield escribió:
>>
>>> udev up to version 208 builds correctly on Sparc v8. However 212 and
>>> greater does
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> El 21/06/14 01:38, Chase Rayfield escribió:
>
>> udev up to version 208 builds correctly on Sparc v8. However 212 and
>> greater does not.
>>
>> Complete build logs of 208 and 214 can be found here:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.c
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kirill Elagin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Lennart Poettering
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Kirill Elagin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 10.06.14 13:58, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>> >
&
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 10.06.14 13:58, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
>> > Symlinks should probably just be considered different type of file, that
>> > have a contents and stuff. The contents is usually a file
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 10.06.14 13:10, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
>
>> Perhaps there's a middle ground we can find. Tom mentioned the idea of
>> a "package" mode during configuration. How about a simpler idea -- if
>> DESTDIR is empty, a
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 09.06.2014 22:32, schrieb Leonid Isaev:
>> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:19:20PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> on our production infrastrcuture these messages would be
>>> *a lot* more than all other logs summarized
>>>
>>> *
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
