On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:21:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 28.06.17 09:06, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodrigue
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote:
>
>> > Do you know how systemd developers feel about the issue (CCed)? Given
>> > that it seems to dominate in data center OSes now I'm
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:25:53PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:39:42 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is that advanced NICs are quite programmable [1] and
> > > depending on use case one may want to load different firmware
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:12:37AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> Making kmod a special case is of course possible. However, as long as
>>> there is no
time now.
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:12:37AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> > commit e64fae5573e566ce4fd9b23c68ac8f3096603314
> >> > Author: Kay Sievers
> >> > Date: Wed Jan 18 05:06:18 2012 +0100
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> How about simply introducing a new flag to finit_module() to indicate
>>> that
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> and added a warning
> >> which is triggered after a third of the timeout.
> >
> > This is great! What commit merged this?I just loo
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
>>>> More than two years
>>>> have gone by on growing design and assumptions on top of that original
>>>> commit. I'm not sure
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11.08.14 18:39, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>>>
&
Tom, thanks for reviewing this! My reply below!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:16 -07
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:16 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:38 PM, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>> > If we want to sort out some sync/async mechanism for probing devices, as
>> &
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:07:10PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > Hey, if you have patches already, I'll be glad to look at them :)
>>
>> OK well I'll spin what I have then, but I'm reviewing
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:51:58PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> > wrote:
>>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 11.08.14 18:39, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>>
>>> > This looks really wrong. We shouldn't permit worker process
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> When Christian tried removing the udev firmware loader
> it was detected that the Dell rbu driver still required
> use of FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER [0]. This driver needed
> reworking to not be tied to the firmware loa
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:42:49AM -0700, Casey Leedom wrote:
> > Part of the problem is that the current
> > architecture has Device Probe happening out of the Module Initialization
> > when we cal
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:42:49AM -0700, Casey Leedom wrote:
>
> On 08/13/2014 04:33 PM, Anish Bhatt wrote:
>> Adding Casey who's actually incharge of this code and missing from the CC
>> list
>
> Thanks Anish!
>
> As I mentioned to Anish, there are fundamentally two problems here in the
> t
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 11.08.14 18:39, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>
>> > This looks really wrong. We shouldn't permit worker processes to be
>> > blocked indefinitely without any timeout applied. Designing
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:50:47PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 08.08.14 19:16, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@do-not-panic.com) wrote:
>
> This looks really wrong. We shouldn't permit worker processes to be
> blocked indefinitely without any timeout applied. Designing a
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> > wrote:
>> &
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was
to introduce a timeout for drivers that are not using asynch
firmware loading. That commit actually would not have triggered
in full effect on udev's usage of kmod for module loading until
comm
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> wrote:
> > The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was
> > to introduce a timeout send to hell drivers that are not using
> > asynch firmw
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
The purpose of commit e64fae55 (January 2012) on systemd was
to introduce a timeout send to hell drivers that are not using
asynch firmware loading. That commit actually would not have
triggered in full effect on udev's usage of kmod for module
loadi
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> El 25/06/14 13:00, Luis R. Rodriguez escribió:
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
>> wrote:
>>> El 12/06/14 21:04, Luis R. Rodriguez escribió:
>>>
>>>> - If you w
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> El 12/06/14 21:04, Luis R. Rodriguez escribió:
>
>> - If you want to use the dynamic link loader you should use
>> AX_AVAILABLE_SYSTEMD() but must then ensure to use -rdynamic -ldl
>> when li
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:24:44PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:19:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12.06.14 18:04, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@do-no
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:19:30PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 12.06.14 18:04, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@do-not-panic.com) wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > so I've been working on getting systemd support on xen for a bit now
> > and thanks to the
Hey folks,
so I've been working on getting systemd support on xen for a bit now
and thanks to the last suggestion about the launcher here on
systemd-devel I think we're on the final stretch now. I'll be
submitting a v6 PATCH series shortly which I think should be the last
if not close to the last
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
> >&
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:22:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 05.06.14 02:31, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (m
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@suse.com) wrote:
>
> > I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas here,
> > in particular that of a launcher idea on
en.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:30:49AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 01:20 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:05:47AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 01:02 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > &g
Hey folks,
Xen systemd support with active sockets and sd_notify() is under way,
we're in what seems to be the final rounds of patch review. One of the
last items we are reviewing is how to best deal with a deamon that has
two binary options for the daemon. They share the same arguments and
in ord
33 matches
Mail list logo
