Hi,
I add two experimental service files in contrib/systemd/ directory.
http://netatalk.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=netatalk/netatalk;a=commit;h=865e4844985b0af1595149af1aa0bf1051796a8d
--
HAT
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel
From: Reindl Harald , Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:27:19 +0100
> Am 02.11.2011 17:20, schrieb HAT:
>>>> # systemctl start netatalk-cnid_metad.service netatalk-afpd.service
>>>
>>> yes, please go this way for the public packages to get them
>>> work in a clean
cnid_metad stops before afpd.
starting order is controllable by "After=".
How is stopping order controlled?
--
HAT
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
orking
GuessMainPID=no
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/afpd
Restart=always
RestartSec=1
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
--
HAT
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
-user.target
B)
[Unit]
Description=XXX
After=netatalk-cnid.service
[Service]
Type=forking
GuessMainPID=no
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/afpd
Restart=always
RestartSec=1
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
--
HAT
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel
If cnidscheme is "tdb" only, it's not necessary to run cnid_metad.
strict setup is:
After=netatalk-cnid.service
Which should we choose between convenience and stringency?
In the future, the situation will become more complicated.
A new daemon "netalockd&qu
ser.target
-------
--
HAT
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
atalkd.service, papd.service and so on.
--
HAT
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
the only purpose provide
> fileservices via netatalk/samba and one of the processes are
> crashing for whatever reason they should be restarted before the
> users are calling me :-)
--
HAT
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> i know that my systemd-service is unacceptable upstream
> but here it is enough this time because only afpd is used
>
>> Systemd MUST control all daemons.
>
> but it does not!
> systemd controls exactly nothing with the "/usr/libexec/netatalk/netatalk.sh"
> an
et it.
>>
>> There are two reasons why systemd failed to detect the new main PID:
>> - issue #3: afpd has a racy daemonization sequence. It writes its PID
>>file too late. My recently proposed patch "service: delayed main PID
>>guessing" should be able
11 matches
Mail list logo
