our service continue.
>
> On June 29, 2018 4:44:27 PM Federico Di Pierro wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> I was wondering whether there was a way for a systemd service to wait for
>> a bus name to appear before starting a service.
>> Something like:
>>
>&
Hi everyone!
I was wondering whether there was a way for a systemd service to wait for a
bus name to appear before starting a service.
Something like:
Requires=org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1
I could not find much googling around.
Is this possible?
Thanks everyone!
Federico
__
2017-05-13 10:57 GMT+02:00 Federico Di Pierro :
> Hi,
>
> i cannot find in doc neither in source a sd_bus_remove_match function.
> How can i properly stop listening on a match? I cannot find any
> information with google; i only see it seems it existed time ago (around
> syste
Hi,
i cannot find in doc neither in source a sd_bus_remove_match function.
How can i properly stop listening on a match? I cannot find any information
with google; i only see it seems it existed time ago (around systemd 210).
Thank you very much for your great work!
Have a nice day,
Federico
Thanks, that was the information i was looking for.
Indeed i was able to solve the issue!
Again, thank you very much,
Federico
2017-04-30 12:55 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Sat, 29.04.17 20:31, Federico Di Pierro (nierr...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> > I'm stru
Hi!
I'm struggling to understand if this can be done: suppose i start polling
on sd_bus_get_fd() without any match; then, after some event happens, i add
a match on same bus.
Will i receive events on my fd just going on polling?
Ie: will this work?
fd = sd_bus_get_fd();
event_happened = 0;
poll(fd)
Hi!
I'm trying to understand if there's a way to properly unlock
a sd_bus_wait() blocking call, as i need the thread where the call is
performed to leave.
The cycle is something like:
while (!quit) {
r = sd_bus_process(signal_bus, NULL);
if (r > 0) {
continue;
Hi!
I'm using systemd 196 on my archlinux, with linux 3.7.0 .
I found out that "systemctl hybrid-sleep" needs to be ran as root. While my
session is active (using systemd-logind feature), and in fact i can
hibernate/poweroff/suspend with my normal user. But hybrid-sleep still
requires superuser pri
Hi!
I was trying to understand how does systemd hibernation process work.
What i mean is: with pm-utils i had to put "tuxonice" in a
/etc/pm/config.d/ file, within the SLEEP_MODULE array, to make pm work with
it.
Systemd instead seems to do this without any input from the user...that's
great, but h
Hi!
I'm using systemd 194 in archlinux. I read that linux 3.6 comes with
hybrid-sleep, finally.
I only rely on systemd to suspend/hibernate (well i use it together with
tuxonice to hibernate, but i don't think this can be a problem). So I was
wondering: will i be able to hybrid-sleep with systemd o
Hi!
I'm usign systemd on arch, and i'm really happy with it.
Today upower 0.9.18 has been released, with systemd support (it will
suspend/hibernate using systemctl suspend/hibernate instead of pm-utils).
I was only wondering: the only thing systemd can't do, right now, is the
pm-powersave part of p
11 matches
Mail list logo
