On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:07 AM Windl, Ulrich wrote:
>
> I wonder: Can such a thing be expressed via an [install] section, too?
[Install] section does not support configuration drop-ins or explicit
ordering directives.
> Fumbling with the filesystem this way feels wrong to me, because when
> u
I wonder: Can such a thing be expressed via an [install] section, too? Fumbling
with the filesystem this way feels wrong to me, because when uninstalling such
a unit, it will probably leave garbage behind (assuming that systemd collects
garbage normally).
Or is the expectation that such garbage
On Mo, 10.02.25 19:09, James Feeney (ja...@nurealm.net) wrote:
> I am chasing a bug in the systemd response to the initiation of an
> ethernet interface "device" unit by the kernel. When an ethernet
> interface "device" unit is initiated by the kernel, systemd will
> Start an associated service u
Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:54:08 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov :
> session-.scope
While also this does shift things around, it does not what one would expect.
Not a problem, thanks for your help.
Olaf
pgp93cN0jK6tN.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Itxaka Serrano Garcia wrote:
> IMHO if you want speed in the initrd and know what you will need in terms
> of kernel, modules and sysroot, just create your own initrd with a single
> binary that extends the PCR, mounts the needed parts and pivots into
