Re: [systemd-devel] systemd --user managers after systemd upgrade

2024-06-29 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:22 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 at 21:16, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > I recently added systemd v256 to Gentoo's ebuild repo. While testing > > the upgrade process from v255, I have run into an issue. > > > > After the upgrade, my KDE Plasma session sto

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd --user managers after systemd upgrade

2024-06-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 at 21:16, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I recently added systemd v256 to Gentoo's ebuild repo. While testing > the upgrade process from v255, I have run into an issue. > > After the upgrade, my KDE Plasma session stopped working, and I was > unable to execute a reboot from the GUI. >

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd --user managers after systemd upgrade

2024-06-29 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
v255 added a new systemd-executor binary – instead of direct fork/setup/exec, now it's fork/exec(executor)/setup/exec(service), to avoid doing too much stuff after fork. But the binary is executed off an open fd, so even though you've upgraded it on disk, the manager is still holding onto its old c

[systemd-devel] systemd --user managers after systemd upgrade

2024-06-29 Thread Mike Gilbert
I recently added systemd v256 to Gentoo's ebuild repo. While testing the upgrade process from v255, I have run into an issue. After the upgrade, my KDE Plasma session stopped working, and I was unable to execute a reboot from the GUI. Looking at the journal, I see several messages like this one:

[systemd-devel] mounts with "nofail" can be unmounted on shutdown before "After=*-fs.target" units

2024-06-29 Thread MichaIng
Hey guys, I have question regarding a certain behaviour of the systemd mount generator. Mounts do not have `Before=*-fs.target` if the `nofail` mount option is added to their `/etc/fstab` entry. From the man page I see that this is intended behaviour: - https://www.freedesktop.org/software/s