Hi all,
We are runing OpenBMC 2.11.0 release which is based on yocto Honister
and systemd 249.7 release, and we find systemctl hangs occasionally. The
phenomenon is just like the below issue:
https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/1097
systemctl command will always return timeout and dmes
On 10. 11. 2022. 10:20, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:57:57AM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
On 04. 11. 2022. 11:40, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
Dear Sirs,
When building a RPM 6.1.0-rc3 for AlmaLinux 8.6, I have enabled
CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
and the result showed an unre
Hi,
> in theory, I have implemented that now, but I somehow cannot make
> userdbd send credentials on, because it does not seem to call
> varlink_write at all. I am a bit lost with that, because as I
> understand the code, all parts of userdbd and homed should be using
> varlink_write when calling
Hi Lennart,
in theory, I have implemented that now, but I somehow cannot make
userdbd send credentials on, because it does not seem to call
varlink_write at all. I am a bit lost with that, because as I
understand the code, all parts of userdbd and homed should be using
varlink_write when calling m
On Mo, 28.11.22 16:27, Dominik George (n...@naturalnet.de) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > You don't have to send that really, the kernel will implicitly attach it
> > automatically whenever the sender's credentials change. Thus, a
> > receiver can safely assume that the ucred remains the same as the
> > SO_PE
Hi,
> You don't have to send that really, the kernel will implicitly attach it
> automatically whenever the sender's credentials change. Thus, a
> receiver can safely assume that the ucred remains the same as the
> SO_PEERCRED data until it receives a new SCM_CREDENTIALS that says
> otherwise.
>
Wanted to follow up on this--was away from my desk because of holidays
in the US. I did open an issue on github:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25548
Thank you for your help here, Lennart.
Thanks,
--Daniel
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:32 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mi, 23.11.
On Mo, 28.11.22 00:14, Dominik George (n...@naturalnet.de) wrote:
65;6800;1c
> Hi,
>
> > The approach brings me a bit farther away from being able to implement it
> > myself, but not too far I guess ;).
>
> I've spent some time reading the userdb code now, and it actually
> seems pretty easy to do
