Re: [systemd-devel] udev and probing of eMMC partition devices

2020-09-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 30.09.20 13:57, Alan Perry (al...@snowmoose.com) wrote: > > > On 9/23/20 9:29 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 22.09.20 10:06, Alan Perry (al...@snowmoose.com) wrote: > > > > > > > device add events will get stuck at the probe step. > > > > "Get stuck"? What does that mean? What is

Re: [systemd-devel] udev and probing of eMMC partition devices

2020-09-30 Thread Alan Perry
On 9/23/20 9:29 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Di, 22.09.20 10:06, Alan Perry (al...@snowmoose.com) wrote: device add events will get stuck at the probe step. "Get stuck"? What does that mean? What is it actually doing? What does a stack trace say? Anything in the logs? When this happens

[systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Q: logrotate and "systemctl kill -s HUP ..."

2020-09-30 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Mantas Mikulenas schrieb am 30.09.2020 um 12:26 in Nachricht : > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:24 AM Ulrich Windl < > ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I have a problem with logrotate: My postrotate command does not seem to >> send a HUP signal. However the files are rotat

Re: [systemd-devel] How to reply to the list

2020-09-30 Thread Dave Howorth
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:35:35 +0200 "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > >>> Dave Howorth schrieb am 28.09.2020 um > >>> 16:34 in > Nachricht <20200928153422.6bf6e...@acer-suse.lan>: > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:10:38 +0200 > > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> can you stop "reply‑all" and breaking threads when res

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Benjamin Berg schrieb am 30.09.2020 um 12:08 in Nachricht <2f6a1d5b102e5dade4f578d6d704b07508d03d50.ca...@sipsolutions.net>: > On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 11:04 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> > > > Reindl Harald schrieb am 30.09.2020 um 10:56 >> > > > in >> Nachricht : >> >> > Am 30.09.20 um 09:06

Re: [systemd-devel] Q: logrotate and "systemctl kill -s HUP ..."

2020-09-30 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:24 AM Ulrich Windl < ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > Hi! > > I have a problem with logrotate: My postrotate command does not seem to > send a HUP signal. However the files are rotated. > I'm using this (not preferred way, I know): > > ... > postrotate

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Benjamin Berg
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 11:04 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > > Reindl Harald schrieb am 30.09.2020 um 10:56 in > Nachricht : > > > Am 30.09.20 um 09:06 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > > > > my webserver is killed because it served at monday, tuesday, thursday > > > > and friday 4 different files with 2 G

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.09.20 um 11:04 schrieb Ulrich Windl: Reindl Harald schrieb am 30.09.2020 um 10:56 in > Nachricht : > >> >> Am 30.09.20 um 09:06 schrieb Ulrich Windl: my webserver is killed because it served at monday, tuesday, thursday and friday 4 different files with 2 GB? >>> >>> cgrou

Re: [systemd-devel] How to reply to the list

2020-09-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.09.20 um 09:35 schrieb Ulrich Windl: Dave Howorth schrieb am 28.09.2020 um 16:34 in > Nachricht <20200928153422.6bf6e...@acer-suse.lan>: >> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:10:38 +0200 >> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> can you stop "reply‑all" and breaking threads when respond to lists? >> >> I can'

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.09.20 um 09:11 schrieb Ulrich Windl: Reindl Harald schrieb am 28.09.2020 um 11:37 in >> httpd don't use 8.7 GB RAM - period > > Are you really sure about that? 1000% sure even if one makes the mistake and multiply the shared opcache of 400 MB with the count of worker processes we

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 30.09.2020 um 10:56 in Nachricht : > > Am 30.09.20 um 09:06 schrieb Ulrich Windl: >>> my webserver is killed because it served at monday, tuesday, thursday >>> and friday 4 different files with 2 GB? >> >> cgroups is for limiting resources, not for killing processes

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.09.20 um 09:06 schrieb Ulrich Windl: >> my webserver is killed because it served at monday, tuesday, thursday >> and friday 4 different files with 2 GB? > > cgroups is for limiting resources, not for killing processes AFAIK [Service] MemoryMax=4G would call OOM killer __

[systemd-devel] Q: logrotate and "systemctl kill -s HUP ..."

2020-09-30 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I have a problem with logrotate: My postrotate command does not seem to send a HUP signal. However the files are rotated. I'm using this (not preferred way, I know): ... postrotate test -s '/var/run/iotwatch-LOC1/iotwatch-LOC1.pid' && systemctl kill -s HUP --kill-who=

[systemd-devel] How to reply to the list

2020-09-30 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Dave Howorth schrieb am 28.09.2020 um 16:34 in Nachricht <20200928153422.6bf6e...@acer-suse.lan>: > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:10:38 +0200 > Reindl Harald wrote: >> can you stop "reply‑all" and breaking threads when respond to lists? > > I can't answer for the reply‑all, that would annoy me as w

[systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 28.09.2020 um 11:37 in Nachricht <0e47024a-faeb-bb78-9b08-fdfad2a23...@thelounge.net>: > > Am 28.09.20 um 11:19 schrieb Benjamin Berg: >>> if i would set "MemoryMax" to 4G "Memory: 8.6G" would kill it when the >>> caches are accounted in that context >> >> No, the k

[systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: Memory in systemctl status

2020-09-30 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 28.09.2020 um 10:08 in Nachricht <5b087cb0-9588-56db-1955-522ac9a6b...@thelounge.net>: > > Am 27.09.20 um 23:39 schrieb Benjamin Berg: > however, that value makes little to no sense and if that's the same > value as accounted for "MemoryMax" it's plain wrong