Hi,
I have a couple of questions regarding systemd shutdown behavior.
I first noticed this behavior using systemd v213, I am now on v232
and see the same problem. I found a fix in 213 and patched
the service.c module, in 232 the change needed to move to the
emergency-action.c module.
The problem
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennart Poettering
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 10:55 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; systemd-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Michael Kelley
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Better network naming on Hyper-V/Azure?
>
> On Fr, 10.01.20 15
Lennart Poettering writes:
> Can you file a bug about this? Sounds like something to fix.
Sure.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Fr, 10.01.20 15:37, Haiyang Zhang (haiya...@microsoft.com) wrote:
> > Hyper-V offers netvsc devices (synthetic NICs) in the same sequence across
> > reboots, so eth0 ... ethN names will associate to the same vNIC every time
> > with Sync-probing currently.
> >
> > But if in the future, we enabl
> -Original Message-
> From: Haiyang Zhang
> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 11:01 AM
> To: Lennart Poettering ; Stephen Hemminger
>
> Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Michael Kelley
>
> Subject: RE: [systemd-devel] Better network naming on Hyper-V/Azure?
> Hyper-V offers netvs
On Do, 09.01.20 20:17, Michael K (vk2...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> I'm trying to use libudev to unbind a usb device from usb-storage driver
> ..This does not seem to work. Can I even do what I'm trying to do or am I
> just doing it wrong ?In the shell # echo -n "1-1.1:1.0" >
> /sys/bus/usb/drivers/us
On Do, 09.01.20 23:27, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 11:03 PM Phillip Susi wrote:
>
> > Someone in #debian mentioned to me that they were getting some odd
> > errors in their logs when running gparted. It seems that several years
> > ago there was someone w
On Do, 09.01.20 15:56, Phillip Susi (ph...@thesusis.net) wrote:
> Someone in #debian mentioned to me that they were getting some odd
> errors in their logs when running gparted. It seems that several
> years
gparted really shouldn't mask units, that's just wrong.
They should just take BSD file
