Re: [systemd-devel] unit symlinks ignored (archlinux mkinitcpio)

2017-09-05 Thread John Lane
Archlinux uses a 'mkinitcpio' script to create the initramfs image file. This copies files into a working directory which it then archives. The problem with this is that files which were symlinks are not in the copy. If the initramfs uses systemd then this is a potential problem. This isn't a sys

Re: [systemd-devel] unit symlinks ignored

2017-09-05 Thread John Lane
On 05/09/17 17:23, John Lane wrote: > Having checked the journal, I see complaints of the form: > > systemd[1]: cryptsetup.target: Wants dependency dropin > /etc/systemd/system/cryptsetup.target.wants/[email protected] is > not a symlink, ignoring. > > However it is most definitely a symlink

[systemd-devel] unit symlinks ignored

2017-09-05 Thread John Lane
I recently upgraded a box which caused systemd to update from 232 to 234. Now it drops into an emergency shell and won't boot without my help. Having checked the journal, I see complaints of the form: systemd[1]: cryptsetup.target: Wants dependency dropin /etc/systemd/system/cryptsetup.target.wan

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd.volatile=yes

2017-09-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 04.09.17 13:48, Tobias Hunger ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > Hmm, mount.usr= should continue to be supported. It's documented in > > the systemd-fstab-generator man page however, not in the > > kernel-com

Re: [systemd-devel] AmbientCapabilities working examples?

2017-09-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 04.09.17 20:35, Kamil Jońca ([email protected]) wrote: > > I try to configure my freeradius service with capabilities > (https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/09/msg00062.html) > > i can do with setting capabilities on freeradius binary. > But I headr about AmbientCapabilities directive a

Re: [systemd-devel] [Question] timezones in timers

2017-09-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 05.09.17 09:41, Ivan Kurnosov ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi, > > was it even considered initially to have proper timezones support in timers? > > Or perhaps it is somewhere in the roadmap? > > In particular, I'm speaking of `[Timer] OnCalendar` You mean as in explicitly per-unit config