[systemd-devel] [systemd.service] TCP listen port conflict resolution / explicit erring?

2017-04-30 Thread Alec Taylor
Wrote some scripts to generate systemd .service files and start-up those services. Currently just for some REST APIs, but soon will include distributed systems also. I set the TCP listen port variable that is used by my .service like so: `Environment=PORT=4200` To get PATH to work nicely, my `Ex

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

2017-04-30 Thread Vlad
I'd like to summarize all the thought about this issue. The systemd behavior regarding PAM stack has been changed: 1. systemd-232: if PAM stack fails service unit is still started, so PAM errors are ignored. 2. systemd-233: if PAM stack fails service unit fails as well. The second is IMO the right

Re: [systemd-devel] sd_bus_add_match after sd_bus_get_fd

2017-04-30 Thread Federico Di Pierro
Thanks, that was the information i was looking for. Indeed i was able to solve the issue! Again, thank you very much, Federico 2017-04-30 12:55 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Sat, 29.04.17 20:31, Federico Di Pierro (nierr...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hi! > > I'm struggling to understand if th

Re: [systemd-devel] iwd and systemd-networkd

2017-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 30.04.17 00:51, Christian Rebischke (chris.rebisc...@archlinux.org) wrote: > Hello everybody, > I have read in a phoronix article that iwd will be integraded into > systemd-networkd.[1] Is this already the case with the newest systemd > version? If not, are there any plans to integrate it

Re: [systemd-devel] sd_bus_add_match after sd_bus_get_fd

2017-04-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 29.04.17 20:31, Federico Di Pierro (nierr...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi! > I'm struggling to understand if this can be done: suppose i start polling > on sd_bus_get_fd() without any match; then, after some event happens, i add > a match on same bus. > Will i receive events on my fd just going