Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Marius Tolzmann
Hi.. On 01.10.2012 20:32, Reindl Harald wrote: and how they should do this after the change that there is no flag? dispaly a RANDOM line? That is a possibility. Based upon that you are only interested in the device anyway, I conclude the mountpoint is irrelevant that makes preety no sense

[systemd-devel] journald.conf vs systemd.journald.conf

2012-10-01 Thread David Lambert
I just noticed that it that journald.conf seems to have replaced systemd.journald.conf; am I correct? Also, looking at the man page for journald.conf it seems that some keywords such as "ImportKernel" have been removed or moved elsewhere? My documentation resource is http://www.freedesktop.or

Re: [systemd-devel] Launching a unit in response to a D-Bus signal

2012-10-01 Thread Mirco Tischler
2012/10/2 Kok, Auke-jan H : > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: >> I have a requirement to restart squid whenever the VPN goes up or down[1]. >> Reading around, it seems that the way to do this would be in response to the >> relevant D-Bus signal, which seems to be this one: >>

Re: [systemd-devel] Launching a unit in response to a D-Bus signal

2012-10-01 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: > I have a requirement to restart squid whenever the VPN goes up or down[1]. > Reading around, it seems that the way to do this would be in response to the > relevant D-Bus signal, which seems to be this one: > > signal sender=:1.6 -> dest=(null

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Michael Biebl
2012/10/1 Reindl Harald : > > and these are basic things which should be considered BEFORE > any invasive change and not after the damage is done since > more than a year You made your point. Can you please just leave it at that? By being an asshole about it, you are just pissing people off and y

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.10.2012 19:22, schrieb Jan Engelhardt: > > On Monday 2012-10-01 15:10, Reindl Harald wrote: > > What is the actual problem? That `df` no longer shows only > user-initiated mounts? df (1p) - report free disk space damned - i have ONE /dev/md2 >

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Monday 2012-10-01 15:10, Reindl Harald wrote: What is the actual problem? That `df` no longer shows only user-initiated mounts? >>> >>> df (1p) - report free disk space >>> >>> damned - i have ONE /dev/md2 >>> if i want to list mounts i typ "mount" and NOT "disk fr

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Peeters Simon
2012/10/1 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 01.10.2012 15:47, schrieb Peeters Simon: >>> so we are turning around in circles >>> there is a bugreport from 2011-05-31 09:19:30 EDT >>> there where many posts more than a year ago on devel-lists >>> >>> YOU say "discuss with coreutils-people" >>> THEY say "requ

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.10.2012 15:47, schrieb Peeters Simon: >> so we are turning around in circles >> there is a bugreport from 2011-05-31 09:19:30 EDT >> there where many posts more than a year ago on devel-lists >> >> YOU say "discuss with coreutils-people" >> THEY say "requested by systemd guys" > > They are

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Peeters Simon
> so we are turning around in circles > there is a bugreport from 2011-05-31 09:19:30 EDT > there where many posts more than a year ago on devel-lists > > YOU say "discuss with coreutils-people" > THEY say "requested by systemd guys" They are right in that the change was requested by systemd, beca

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.10.2012 15:23, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: > On 10/01/2012 01:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> and how they should do this after the change that there >> is no flag? dispaly a RANDOM line? > > Is that not something you should be discussing with them? so we are turning around in circles t

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 10/01/2012 01:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: and how they should do this after the change that there is no flag? dispaly a RANDOM line? Is that not something you should be discussing with them? JBG ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.f

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.10.2012 14:41, schrieb Jan Engelhardt: > > On Saturday 2012-09-29 22:21, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> What is the actual problem? That `df` no longer shows only >>> user-initiated mounts? >> >> df (1p) - report free disk space >> >> damned - i have ONE /dev/md2 >> if i want

[systemd-devel] XDG_SEAT for kmscon

2012-10-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi I am currently working on making kmscon a drop-in replacement for agetty and was wondering how XDG_SEAT has to be set to correctly mark the seat-name for new logins? I currently simply spawn /bin/login from kmscon, but it doesn't set up the seat-name correctly (it simply passes ""). Setting XD

Re: [systemd-devel] nfs mounts and the "nofail" option

2012-10-01 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 30/09/12 14:03 did gyre and gimble: > Hi, > > As we've discussed the semantics of (specifically) nfs mounts with the > nofail option, it seems that latest libmount+nfs-utils do not handle the > nofail option between them which causes mount failures if it's speci

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Saturday 2012-09-29 22:21, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> What is the actual problem? That `df` no longer shows only >> user-initiated mounts? > >df (1p) - report free disk space > >damned - i have ONE /dev/md2 >if i want to list mounts i typ "mount" and NOT "disk free" I think in

[systemd-devel] Launching a unit in response to a D-Bus signal

2012-10-01 Thread Matthew Booth
I have a requirement to restart squid whenever the VPN goes up or down[1]. Reading around, it seems that the way to do this would be in response to the relevant D-Bus signal, which seems to be this one: signal sender=:1.6 -> dest=(null destination) serial=269 path=/org/freedesktop/NetworkManag

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.10.2012 13:29, schrieb Karel Zak: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 07:36:54PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > There is no difference. The "bind" is an operation, not a special > state of any mountpoint. Nowhere in the system is information that > the mountpoint has been created by "bind" -- the k

Re: [systemd-devel] when will mount / df get fixed?

2012-10-01 Thread Karel Zak
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 07:36:54PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > you missunderstood me > > that all mount are in the output is OK > BUT all the years there was a hint taht it is a bind-mount > since systemd/F15 there is no difference There is no difference. The "bind" is an operation, not a spec

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-10-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 01/10/12 09:42 did > gyre and gimble: > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > >> 'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 28/09/12 20:09 did gyre and gimble:

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-10-01 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 01/10/12 09:42 did gyre and gimble: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 28/09/12 20:09 did gyre and gimble: >>> 1) people should fix 'make' to just allow `-j` without an argument

Re: [systemd-devel] XDM and systemd --user

2012-10-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:02:11PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Kok, Auke-jan H at 28/09/12 20:09 did gyre and gimble: > > 1) people should fix 'make' to just allow `-j` without an argument > > (seriously, dude ;^) ) > > Going dangerously off-topic, but two points: > > If you'

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] journald: assert target instead of page

2012-10-01 Thread Lukas Nykryn
--- src/journal/journal-gatewayd.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/journal/journal-gatewayd.c b/src/journal/journal-gatewayd.c index b7acfba..0957dcb 100644 --- a/src/journal/journal-gatewayd.c +++ b/src/journal/journal-gatewayd.c @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ s