Op 17 jul 2011, om 19:45 heeft Ryan Nelson het volgende geschreven:
> On 7/16/2011 1:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Sat, 16.07.11 10:43, Ryan Nelson (ryan.freedesk...@rnelnet.com) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ok, so I read more on systemd (and the man page for inittab) and
>>> came up with a basic
On 7/16/2011 1:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 16.07.11 10:43, Ryan Nelson (ryan.freedesk...@rnelnet.com) wrote:
Ok, so I read more on systemd (and the man page for inittab) and
came up with a basic vgetty.service that I'm using with systemd.
After doing little ready its pretty easy.
On Sun, 17.07.11 06:32, Sergey (sergem...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
sorry, but I am not interested. Unix is an inspiration but it is not
dogma.
Integration avoids duplication, integration hence avoids bloat. Note
that systemd is not monolothic anyway. For example, you can just remove
the bus mech
Hi *
I really like systemd concept and currently I'm in process of migrating
my Arch based home server form runit to systemd.
Regarding this I have some basic usage related questions.
If this is wrong place to ask this type of questions - forgive me and
pls hint me where is best place to ask.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Sergey wrote:
> The End
> ===
> I'm writing these ideas here because I'm not experienced enough to implement
> them myself. So I just hope that people in this list, that are much more
> experienced, will like them. Thanks for reading.
I've seen this type of
Op 17 jul 2011, om 05:32 heeft Sergey het volgende geschreven:
> "Why is this better?"
> =
> Because it's flexible, portable, simple, easy to support and it's unix-way.
>
> Such structure would work under any circumstances on almost any configuration.
> Users of other Linux dis
