* Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear OE folks,
>
>
> task compile of `systemd_git.bb` fails with the following error message
> using `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`. Using `minimal`,
> i. e. EGLIBC, works.
>
> […]
> | CC src/libsystemd_core_la-manager.lo
> | s
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:55:24PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 5/10/2011 3:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >
> > In the interest of keeping userspace from having to create new root
> > filesystems all the time, let's follow the lead of the other in-kernel
> > filesystem
On 5/10/2011 3:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> In the interest of keeping userspace from having to create new root
> filesystems all the time, let's follow the lead of the other in-kernel
> filesystems and provide a proper mount point for it in sysfs.
>
> For selinuxfs, this m
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
In the interest of keeping userspace from having to create new root
filesystems all the time, let's follow the lead of the other in-kernel
filesystems and provide a proper mount point for it in sysfs.
For selinuxfs, this mount point should be in /sys/fs/selinux/
Cc: St
Dear systemd folks,
I am sorry for this message. I first wanted it to send to systemd-devel
but decided to send it to openembedded-devel instead and forgot to
update the address. If you have any insight though it is most welcome.
Thanks,
PAul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On 9 May 2011 22:46, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> You are lacking autofs4 support in the kernel. You should fix this first.
I'm not, autofs4 is present, we're working on figuring out on why
systemd complains at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36993
> Your udev in your initrd is a dif
Dear OE folks,
task compile of `systemd_git.bb` fails with the following error message
using `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`. Using `minimal`,
i. e. EGLIBC, works.
[…]
| CC src/libsystemd_core_la-manager.lo
| src/manager.c: In function 'manager_new':
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 20:37, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> root@beagleboard-systemd:~# time ( udevadm trigger ; udevadm settle )
>>>
>>> real 0m10.475s
>>
>> Ok, at least the timeout issue seems gone.
>>
>> How many device do you have?
>> find /sys -name uevent | wc -l
>
> root@beagleboard-systemd:/
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi
---
src/systemd-analyze |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemd-analyze b/src/systemd-analyze
index 4f3e478..ae7dcfb 100755
--- a/src/systemd-analyze
+++ b/src/systemd-analyze
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ elif sys.argv[1] == 'blame'
Op 10 mei 2011, om 19:01 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:34, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
>> So after rebuilding eglibc against 2.6.37 headers and udev from git:
>>
>> root@beagleboard-systemd:~# time ( udevadm trigger ; udevadm settle )
>>
>> real0m10.475s
>
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi
---
src/systemd-analyze |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/systemd-analyze b/src/systemd-analyze
index 4f3e478..49a2727 100755
--- a/src/systemd-analyze
+++ b/src/systemd-analyze
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ elif sys.argv[1] == 'blame'
On Tue, 10.05.11 21:18, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Instead, just use "systemctl reload-or-restart ..." in your client code
> > and things will work fine. We added "reload-or-restart" precisely for
> > use cases like this, so, go, use it!
>
> Sorry, but we must provide goo
> Instead, just use "systemctl reload-or-restart ..." in your client code
> and things will work fine. We added "reload-or-restart" precisely for
> use cases like this, so, go, use it!
Sorry, but we must provide good support systemd and SysV in our discributive.
Our "service" knows nothing about "r
On Wed, 04.05.11 10:28, Harald Hoyer (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Am 03.05.2011 18:02, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Tue, 03.05.11 16:39, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >> From: Harald Hoyer
> >>
> >> systemd-vconsole-setup did not process any configuration files, if
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:34, Koen Kooi wrote:
> So after rebuilding eglibc against 2.6.37 headers and udev from git:
>
> root@beagleboard-systemd:~# time ( udevadm trigger ; udevadm settle )
>
> real 0m10.475s
Ok, at least the timeout issue seems gone.
How many device do you have?
find /
On Tue, 10.05.11 20:50, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2011/5/10 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Tue, 10.05.11 20:03, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> Our logrotate after finish run script syslog-reload (detect syslog
> >> daemon - sysklogd or
On Wed, 04.05.11 11:01, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
> on a read-only file-system 'unlink' returns EROFS (Read-only file
> system) even if the file does not exists. To avoid false errors,
> check if the file exists first.
I now commited a different fix for this. Please test!
2011/5/10 Lennart Poettering :
> On Tue, 10.05.11 20:03, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Our logrotate after finish run script syslog-reload (detect syslog
>> daemon - sysklogd or syslog-ng or rsyslog, and run service foo reload)
>> But some services do not support r
On Wed, 04.05.11 11:01, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
> otherwise building fails if it doesn't exist:
>
> ( cd /usr/share/dbus-1/services && \
> rm -f org.freedesktop.systemd1.service && \
> ln -s ../system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.serv
2011/5/10 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 05/10/2011 04:03 PM, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Our logrotate after finish run script syslog-reload (detect syslog
>> daemon - sysklogd or syslog-ng or rsyslog, and run service foo reload)
>> But some services do not support reload, for exampl
On Tue, 10.05.11 20:03, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Our logrotate after finish run script syslog-reload (detect syslog
> daemon - sysklogd or syslog-ng or rsyslog, and run service foo reload)
> But some services do not support reload, for example rsyslog.
> In init.
On Tue, 10.05.11 09:25, Scott James Remnant (sc...@netsplit.com) wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
> barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
>
> > I'm not following all the user-session discussion, but AFAIU this
> > management will be done by the same code, but not sam
On 05/10/2011 04:03 PM, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
Hello!
Our logrotate after finish run script syslog-reload (detect syslog
daemon - sysklogd or syslog-ng or rsyslog, and run service foo reload)
But some services do not support reload, for example rsyslog.
In init.d/rsyslog i can add reload=restart
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> I'm not following all the user-session discussion, but AFAIU this
> management will be done by the same code, but not same process (it's not
> PID1). PAM (or another entity that has a role in the login/lo
Hello!
Our logrotate after finish run script syslog-reload (detect syslog
daemon - sysklogd or syslog-ng or rsyslog, and run service foo reload)
But some services do not support reload, for example rsyslog.
In init.d/rsyslog i can add reload=restart
Very necessary add option to foo.service like
Re
On Mon, 09.05.11 19:52, Scott James Remnant (sc...@netsplit.com) wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
> barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
>
> >
> >> Well, right now let's make clear that Firefox/Chromium or other X clients
> >> won't be started by systemd as they are
On Mon, 09.05.11 19:49, Scott James Remnant (sc...@netsplit.com) wrote:
> > We can now boot a resonably complete GNOME userspace in less than
> > 1s. Given that that is the *total* these days, I really don't
> > understand why you are concerned about the startup speed of individual
> > service, an
On Tue, 10.05.11 17:34, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>
>
> Op 10 mei 2011, om 14:14 heeft Lennart Poettering het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Tue, 10.05.11 14:11, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 10.05.2011 14:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >>
Op 10 mei 2011, om 14:14 heeft Lennart Poettering het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 10.05.11 14:11, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 10.05.2011 14:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>>> On Tue, 10.05.11 13:47, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>>>
> What ud
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
> barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Well, right now let's make clear that Firefox/Chromium or other X clients
>>> won't be started by systemd as they are user session ap
Op 10 mei 2011, om 14:14 heeft Lennart Poettering het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 10.05.11 14:11, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 10.05.2011 14:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>>> On Tue, 10.05.11 13:47, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>>>
> What ud
On Tue, 10.05.11 14:11, Harald Hoyer (harald.ho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Am 10.05.2011 14:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >On Tue, 10.05.11 13:47, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
> >
> >>>What udev version is that? I'm running current -git, maybe something
> >>>was broken, don't k
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:11, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 10.05.2011 14:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>>
>> On Tue, 10.05.11 13:47, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>>
What udev version is that? I'm running current -git, maybe something
was broken, don't know it though.
>>>
Am 10.05.2011 14:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 10.05.11 13:47, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
What udev version is that? I'm running current -git, maybe something
was broken, don't know it though.
[ 122.891967]<27>udevd[88]: unable to receive ctrl connection: Functio
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:09, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 10.05.11 13:47, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>
>> > What udev version is that? I'm running current -git, maybe something
>> > was broken, don't know it though.
>>
>> [ 122.891967] <27>udevd[88]: unable to receive
On Tue, 10.05.11 13:47, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
> > What udev version is that? I'm running current -git, maybe something
> > was broken, don't know it though.
>
> [ 122.891967] <27>udevd[88]: unable to receive ctrl connection: Function not
> implemented
>
> Time to rebuil
Op 10 mei 2011, om 12:28 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:22, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
It's 3 minutes exactly (+trigger and shell overhead) every time, so I
guess I'm hitting some kind of timeout
>>>
>>> It's 180 sec, yeah. Doesn't it print what devi
Op 10 mei 2011, om 12:28 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:22, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
It's 3 minutes exactly (+trigger and shell overhead) every time, so I
guess I'm hitting some kind of timeout
>>>
>>> It's 180 sec, yeah. Doesn't it print what devi
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:22, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> It's 3 minutes exactly (+trigger and shell overhead) every time, so I guess
>>> I'm hitting some kind of timeout
>>
>> It's 180 sec, yeah. Doesn't it print what device it waited for?
>
> udevadm doesn't
>
>> If you add: "... settle --timeout=10
Op 10 mei 2011, om 11:55 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 10 mei 2011, om 10:36 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 10 mei 2011, om 10:36 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
>>
Things like:
time (udevadm trigger; ude
Op 10 mei 2011, om 10:36 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
>
>>> Things like:
>>> time (udevadm trigger; udevadm settle)
>>
>> root@beagleboard-systemd:~# time ( ud
Am 10.05.2011 10:40, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
Am 10.05.2011 10:36, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:26, Koen Kooi
wrote:
Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
Things like:
time (udevadm trigger; udevadm settle)
root@beagleboard-systemd:~# time ( ude
Am 10.05.2011 10:36, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
Things like:
time (udevadm trigger; udevadm settle)
root@beagleboard-systemd:~# time ( udevadm trigger ; udevadm settle)
real3
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
>> Things like:
>> time (udevadm trigger; udevadm settle)
>
> root@beagleboard-systemd:~# time ( udevadm trigger ; udevadm settle)
>
> real 3m0.475s
3 Minutes?
> UDEV [13050
Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 22:08, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 09.05.11 22:02, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>>
It's still in the 10 second range on a 600MHz cortex-a8 machine
booting from
Op 9 mei 2011, om 22:23 heeft Kay Sievers het volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 22:08, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 09.05.11 22:02, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>>
It's still in the 10 second range on a 600MHz cortex-a8 machine
booting from
47 matches
Mail list logo
