Re: [systemd-devel] systemd, getty and udev

2011-03-24 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:10:23PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > May be this special console unit simply need not be bound to device? > Is it even possible for console to disappear? Sure, think of usb-serial devices. pgpER3CnThhEq.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: do not apply SysV ordering to native services

2011-03-24 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:37:12 +0300 Andrey Borzenkov wrote: >> Yes, you are right. But blindly resetting SysV priority is still wrong >> - native unit may have defined it as well. > > That's a good point. I did not realize "SysVStartPriority=

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: do not apply SysV ordering to native services

2011-03-24 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:37:12 +0300 Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > Yes, you are right. But blindly resetting SysV priority is still wrong > - native unit may have defined it as well. That's a good point. I did not realize "SysVStartPriority=" exists. > This ordering is applied only for service without

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: do not apply SysV ordering to native services

2011-03-24 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:15:10 +0300 Andrey Borzenkov wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Michal Schmidt >> wrote: >> > In Fedora udev-retry.service exists both as a native unit and as a >> > legacy SysV service. The ordering inferred

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: do not apply SysV ordering to native services

2011-03-24 Thread Michal Schmidt
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:15:10 +0300 Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Michal Schmidt > wrote: > > In Fedora udev-retry.service exists both as a native unit and as a > > legacy SysV service. The ordering inferred from the rc.d symlink > > farm is being incorrectly applied to

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: do not apply SysV ordering to native services

2011-03-24 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > In Fedora udev-retry.service exists both as a native unit and as a > legacy SysV service. The ordering inferred from the rc.d symlink farm is > being incorrectly applied to the native unit: > Then something is fishy. Native unit hides SysV

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: do not apply SysV ordering to native services

2011-03-24 Thread Michal Schmidt
In Fedora udev-retry.service exists both as a native unit and as a legacy SysV service. The ordering inferred from the rc.d symlink farm is being incorrectly applied to the native unit: $ systemctl show -p After -p Before udev-retry.service Before=basic.target dnsmasq.service netconsole.service ir

Re: [systemd-devel] Improve boot-time of systemd

2011-03-24 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, fykc...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> 2011/3/18 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : > >>>  2. should we do (or have a way to

Re: [systemd-devel] Improve boot-time of systemd

2011-03-24 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, fykc...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2011/3/18 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : >>>  2. should we do (or have a way to) force a manual ordering to help >>> Xorg/DM/WM by avoiding spawn of concurrent services?

Re: [systemd-devel] Improve boot-time of systemd

2011-03-24 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, fykc...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/3/18 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri : >>  2. should we do (or have a way to) force a manual ordering to help >> Xorg/DM/WM by avoiding spawn of concurrent services? We know these >> have the higher priority, but it's a higher prio