On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:07:26PM +0300, Alexey Shabalin
> wrote:
>> But i have not some rule with "vgchange -a y", and have lv-disk as "LV
>> Status not available"
>
> Here is what we use at the moment:
>
> [Unit]
> Description=LVM activat
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:07:26PM +0300, Alexey Shabalin
wrote:
> But i have not some rule with "vgchange -a y", and have lv-disk as "LV
> Status not available"
Here is what we use at the moment:
[Unit]
Description=LVM activation
DefaultDependencies=no
After=udev-settle.service
Before=local-fs
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 05.11.10 19:14, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> It is rather interesting. I was testing unrelated patch for dracut
>> >> using dracut tip. It turned out, dracut now installs
>> >> systemd-vconsole-setup when
>> >> I know that swap on lvm no good practics, but need foolproof.
>> >
>> > If you use LVM make sure to use a new version that properly installs its
>> > udev rules.
>> I used lvm-2.02.84. I don't see udev rules that run "vgchange -a y".
> Well, ensure you have /lib/udev/rules.d/11-dm-lvm.rules i
On Thu, 17.02.11 13:46, Miklos Vajna (vmik...@frugalware.org) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Hmm, I am kinda keen on keeping the fsck output also in syslog, hence
> > just switching the output from syslog to tty is not ideal. Maybe we
> > shoul
On Thu, 17.02.11 18:25, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 16.02.11 17:37, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
> >
> >> You can see in log:
> >> Feb 16 16:04:51 host-29 kernel: [ 11.636564] Adding 524284k swap on
> >> /de
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 16.02.11 17:37, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
>
>> You can see in log:
>> Feb 16 16:04:51 host-29 kernel: [ 11.636564] Adding 524284k swap on
>> /dev/mapper/VG1-Swap. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:524284k
>> Feb 16 16:04:51 host-29 ke
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Hmm, I am kinda keen on keeping the fsck output also in syslog, hence
> just switching the output from syslog to tty is not ideal. Maybe we
> should add a mechanism so that we can output things to syslog and
> console at the sa
