On Tue, 08.02.11 16:54, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> >> a) mdmon is perfectly capable of restarting, it is already used to
> >> take over mdmon launched in initrd. The problem is to know when to
> >> restart - i.e. when respective libraries are changed. This is a job
> >> for pack
On Tue, 08.02.11 14:28, Cristian Patrascu (cristian.patra...@windriver.com)
wrote:
> >I think tis current behaviour probably makes little sense, so my
> >suggestion would be to simply change it and run the services listed in
> >OnFailure= only after we tried to restart the service and gave up.
>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 13:52, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
>> I am probably the wrong one to ask, but here is what happens when
>> array is started (from udev perspective)
>
> [...]
>
>> After this event device goes "plugged" a
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> Well, yes. ps supresses the output if a process is in the root group of
> a hierarchy, because by default all processes are in the default
> group. To get the full list of cgorup memberships you could look into
> /proc/$(pidof rtkit-dae
On 02/08/2011 12:34 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 07.02.11 10:01, Cristian Patrascu (cristian.patra...@windriver.com)
wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:19 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2011/2/3 Tomasz Torcz:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:35:55PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
ExecStartOnFailure=/some/cm
On Sat, 29.01.11 09:47, Eugeni Dodonov (eug...@mandriva.com) wrote:
> Don't know if it is possible, but the following would be almost ideal
> debugging thing for cases I am having problems with - something like a
> signal which systemd would catch and dump everything it is doing right
> now; or du
On Tue, 08.02.11 14:52, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> >> I speak about failure of rtkit-daemon to put itself in RT scheduling
> >> group on startup. At this point there is no login at all.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I rebuild systemd with your PAM patch and restarted system and
> >> as expe
On Tue, 08.02.11 14:49, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> > Oh, intreresting. It's in "failed" state. Can you check syslog/kmsg if
> > systemd generated any kind of log output when this happened? i.e. around
> > Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:36:51 +0300. This should give us a hint on what
> >
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> But please begin now to adopt the generic distro-agnostic configuration
> files we support in systemd. Sooner or later the distribution-specific
> code in systemd will be removed at which time you'd have to continue to
> maintain this code
On Wed, 26.01.11 18:10, Lucas De Marchi (lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi) wrote:
> There's already a condition that gives a warning if user is
> cross-compiling an relying on files from the build system. AC_CHECK_FILE
> macro only tests for file in the build system. Hence use a simple
> 'test -f' th
On Wed, 26.01.11 16:46, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi all!
> I added basic support for ALTLinux.
> Please see patch or
> http://git.altlinux.org/people/shaba/packages/systemd.git?p=systemd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/altlinux
> Thanks.
Applied.
But please begin now to adopt
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 14:22, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 08.02.11 13:30, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Fe
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:50 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 13:41, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:09 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mon, 07.02.11 18:49, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Tue, 08.02.11 14:22, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 08.02.11 13:30, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lennart Poettering
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue,
On Wed, 26.01.11 17:59, Lucas De Marchi (lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi) wrote:
> This removes some warnings when bootstrapping. The warnings were introduced
> in autoconf 2.68. Reference:
Commited.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
sy
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 13:30, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 08.02.11 12:29, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>> >
>> >> > The rtkit patc
On Tue, 08.02.11 13:52, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> I am probably the wrong one to ask, but here is what happens when
> array is started (from udev perspective)
[...]
> After this event device goes "plugged" and SYSTEMD_WANTS (if any) are
> triggered. But at this point we have
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Mon, 07.02.11 14:24, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
>>> How chenge (Condition1 || Condition2) to (Condition1 && Condition2)
>> I'd very much prefer not having to extend the condition
On Tue, 08.02.11 13:47, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 07.02.11 14:24, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
> >> How chenge (Condition1 || Condition2) to (Condition1 && Condition2)
> > I'd very much prefer not having to
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 04.02.11 22:55, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
>> >> That's right, but the names are not known in advance and can change
>> >> between reboots. This means such units have to be generated
>> >> dynamically, exist un
On Tue, 08.02.11 13:41, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:09 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 07.02.11 18:49, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> >
> > > Hello. I'm new in this list.
> > > I'm using systemd-17. I'm try to use ss
On Thu, 27.01.11 15:44, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi!
> libselinux has a pkg-config file:
Oh, weird. Seems to be a new addition.
> Patch for use pkg-config in attach.
Applied. (and subsequently modified a bit, so that the logic of this
feature works like the other optional
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.02.11 14:24, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
>> How chenge (Condition1 || Condition2) to (Condition1 && Condition2)
> I'd very much prefer not having to extend the condition language to more
> than what it currently covers. So, before
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:09 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.02.11 18:49, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
>
> > Hello. I'm new in this list.
> > I'm using systemd-17. I'm try to use sshd.socket and sshd@.service (run
> > sshd in inetd mode). After i'm start service wit
On Tue, 08.02.11 13:30, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 08.02.11 12:29, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> >
> >> > The rtkit patch ensures rtkit itself can get RT privs. This systemd
> >> > patch
On Mon, 07.02.11 10:01, Cristian Patrascu (cristian.patra...@windriver.com)
wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2011 11:19 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >2011/2/3 Tomasz Torcz:
> >>On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:35:55PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>>ExecStartOnFailure=/some/cmd (send an email or what not)
> >> Isn
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 08.02.11 12:29, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>>
>>> > The rtkit patch ensures rtkit itself can get RT privs. This systemd
>>> > patch ensures apps (such
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 12:29, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
>> > The rtkit patch ensures rtkit itself can get RT privs. This systemd
>> > patch ensures apps (such as PA) started within a systemd session can get
>> > RT privs. Wi
On Thu, 03.02.11 22:19, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2011/2/3 Tomasz Torcz :
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:35:55PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> ExecStartOnFailure=/some/cmd (send an email or what not)
> >
> > Isn't “OnFailure=send-email-to-admin.service” sufficent?
>
> Havin
On Thu, 03.02.11 21:35, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2011/2/3 Cristian Patrascu :
> > So, for these last two features I created a patch, which adds two more
> > options for a .service :
> > - RestartRetries=n (where n is the number of restart retries)
> > - ExecPostRestarts=/some/c
On Tue, 08.02.11 12:29, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> > The rtkit patch ensures rtkit itself can get RT privs. This systemd
> > patch ensures apps (such as PA) started within a systemd session can get
> > RT privs. Without neither patch neither side can get RT privs. To work
> > pr
On Mon, 07.02.11 18:49, Vasiliy G Tolstov (v.tols...@selfip.ru) wrote:
> Hello. I'm new in this list.
> I'm using systemd-17. I'm try to use sshd.socket and sshd@.service (run
> sshd in inetd mode). After i'm start service with systemctl start
> sshd.socket i'm able to connect. But after some tim
On Fri, 04.02.11 22:55, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> >> That's right, but the names are not known in advance and can change
> >> between reboots. This means such units have to be generated
> >> dynamically, exist until reboot (ramfs?) and be removed when array is
> >> destroyed. N
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 11:27, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
>> >> Yupp, there's a ControlGroups=cpu:/ missing in the rtkit service file. I
>> >> have forgotten to commit that. Will fix this soon.
>> >
>> > Fixed now in rtkit an
On Tue, 08.02.11 16:49, Chanwoo Choi (cwcho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Dear members,
>
Heya,
> [4.310630] systemd[1]: Succesfully opened /dev/kmsg for logging.
> [4.315351] systemd[1]: systemd 16 running in system mode. (-PAM -LIBWRAP
> -AUDIT -SELINUX +SYSVINIT -LIBCRYPTSETUP; ubuntu)
> We
On Mon, 07.02.11 14:24, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello!
> I need define several conditions in [Unit].
> ConditionPathExists=/sbin/startevms
> ConditionKernelCommandLine=!noevms
> Service must run only if both conditions is true.
> Now service run if at least one condition is
On Tue, 08.02.11 11:27, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
> >> Yupp, there's a ControlGroups=cpu:/ missing in the rtkit service file. I
> >> have forgotten to commit that. Will fix this soon.
> >
> > Fixed now in rtkit and systemd git.
> >
>
> The last commit on http://git.0pointer.de/?
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 03.02.11 21:15, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, 29.01.11 12:01, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> > wrote:
>> > >
On Thu, 03.02.11 21:15, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29.01.11 12:01, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > Heya,
> > >
> > > just wanted to let everybody know that I reverted
39 matches
Mail list logo
