On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:22:52PM +0100, Kay Sievers
wrote:
> I applied this.
Thanks.
> But keep in mind that we will remove most of these distro-specific
> things some day, after the new "linux default" config files are
> commonly used. Then these patches will need to move into the distro
> p
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Sedat Dilek
>> wrote:
>>> Serial-console or net-console was recommended to me, this requires a
>>> 2nd machine...
>>
>> I used VM with serial port r
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 18:26, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ran Benita (ran...@gmail.com) said:
>> These tiny differences were confusing enough for the author of the
>> manpage, and I managed to get it wrong as well;
>> upon closer examination, I was perhaps a bit reckless...
>> The LSB page here
>> h
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Serial-console or net-console was recommended to me, this requires a
> 2nd machine...
I used VM with serial port redirection when I needed early console
trace. Is easier than second system.
___
syste
Ran Benita (ran...@gmail.com) said:
> These tiny differences were confusing enough for the author of the
> manpage, and I managed to get it wrong as well;
> upon closer examination, I was perhaps a bit reckless...
> The LSB page here
> http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_4.0.0/LSB-Core-generi
Ozan Çağlayan (o...@pardus.org.tr) said:
> Maybe systemd-vconsole-setup should be started after plymouthd quits, I don't
> know.
>
> Ideas?
vconsole setup needs done before plymouth grabs the tty.
Billl
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@li
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 14:42, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> We recently packaged systemd (it's not default yet), and not so
> surprisingly needed a few changes to get it running. All changes are
> specific to our target.
I applied this.
But keep in mind that we will remove most of these distro-specific
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 14:36, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> The moderators of the ML should re-think if 40KiB is a bit low (100KiB
> should be fine, when ppl want to attach a screenshot taken with their
> digicam).
It's 300kb now.
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:36:41PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Sedat Dilek
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have tried the vfs-scale-working patch-set from [1] (GIT tree see [2]).
>> > Unfortunately, I cannot b
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:36:41PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Sedat Dilek
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have tried the vfs-scale-working patch-set from [1] (GIT tree see [2]).
> > Unfortunately, I cannot boot my Debian/sid i386 system with systemd
> > (system freeze
---
Hi,
We recently packaged systemd (it's not default yet), and not so
surprisingly needed a few changes to get it running. All changes are
specific to our target.
(Sorry in case this arrives twice, looks like the first patch got lost.)
Thanks.
Makefile.am |7 +++
configure.
Sorry for resending this, but systemd-devel ML does not accept file
attachments >= 40KiB.
I know it's not loved to reference to pastebin services, but resizing
orig-pic with -10% (convert tool) has still more than 40KiB.
The moderators of the ML should re-think if 40KiB is a bit low (100KiB
should
12 matches
Mail list logo
