Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said:
> Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy
> to rename this.
>
> So, Kay and I came up with these two ideas:
>
> KeepAfterExit=
> ActiveAfterExit=
It brings back the word you just dropped elsewhere, but maybe
'F
On 14 August 2010 01:38, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 13.08.10 16:22, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Friday 13 Aug 2010 15:54:28 Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > On Fri, 13.08.10 00:18, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote:
>> > > > > So [auditctl] would be something to set to "Type
On Fri, 13.08.10 16:22, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote:
>
> On Friday 13 Aug 2010 15:54:28 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 13.08.10 00:18, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote:
> > > > > So [auditctl] would be something to set to "Type=finish" and
> > > > > "ValidNoProcess=no".
> > > > >
> >
On Friday 13 Aug 2010 15:54:28 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 13.08.10 00:18, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote:
> > > > So [auditctl] would be something to set to "Type=finish" and
> > > > "ValidNoProcess=no".
> > > >
> > > > (Oh, and if you have a better suggestion for a name of
> > > > Vali
On Fri, 13.08.10 00:18, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote:
> > > So [auditctl] would be something to set to "Type=finish" and
> > > "ValidNoProcess=no".
>
> > > (Oh, and if you have a better suggestion for a name of ValidNoProcess= I
> > > am all ears too!)
>
> 'RequiresProcess='?
Hmm, that woul
On Fri, 13.08.10 08:52, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
> | > 'function'
> | > 'oneshot'
> | > 'single'
> | > 'not-respawning'
> | >
> | > (None of these are necessarily good.)
> |
> | "oneshot" sounds the best choice from this list to me. What are your
> | opinions on "transient"?
> |
>
On 13.08.2010 09:52, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> I'd be happier with Type=oneshot, since it communicates more clearly
> what it is about, especially to people without a math/CS background.
Type=oneshot does really explain what will happen when the process starts.
As a person who doesn't speak Eng
Am 13.08.2010 12:49, schrieb Claes H:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> So, maybe "Type=transient" is nicer? Sounds a bit scientific but this
>> word is not unheard in the Free software world at least (i.e. X uses
>> that iirc) and describes pretty accurately what
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> So, maybe "Type=transient" is nicer? Sounds a bit scientific but this
> word is not unheard in the Free software world at least (i.e. X uses
> that iirc) and describes pretty accurately what these kind of processes
> are used for, i.e. t
