Anton & all:
comments to just to those things that I think I need to comment on - the
others are snipped out (basically agreement from my side).
> > > > - esay human interaction - not just reading but also (telnet)
> > > > crafting messages
> > > > (I couldn't envision troubleshooting SMTP conf
Rainer & all:
Let me comment on something...
> > > - esay human interaction - not just reading but also (telnet)
> > > crafting messages
> > > (I couldn't envision troubleshooting SMTP configs without
> > > the ability to
> > > telnet SMTP commands)
This is analogy is not quite kosher IMO.
information.
dbh
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: binary fields in syslog
>
> Hi WG,
>
> this is not only in
ore we get more comments from
others ;)
Rainer
> -Original Message-
> From: Anton Okmianski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:31 PM
> To: Rainer Gerhards; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: binary fields in syslog
>
> Rainer & all:
>
&g
ed size headers: 1 or 12 bytes. Still better
than a variable field size for every field.
Anton.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
Hi WG,
this is not only in reply to Anton's posts, but a general thing. So I
thought I start with a new subject.
Anton suggest the use of a binary header in -transport (eg
http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/autoarc/msg01197.html). Previously, all
numbers in syslog were expressed in ASCII digits terminated
