Andrew,
> In order for us to map older syslog into the new -protocol,
> we should at
> least reference the existing facilities and levels that are
> mentioned in
> 3164.
based on the discussion, I now think it is not strictly necessary to
specify the table.
I think one of Anton's core ideas is t
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 11:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Facilities and Severity
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
> again on the edit: I am replacing the few fixed facilities by
> a 4-digit number right now. I wond
PROTECTED]
Subject: Facilities and Severity
Hi WG,
again on the edit: I am replacing the few fixed facilities by a 4-digit
number right now. I wonder if it would still make sense to mention the
traditional facilities in -protocol. Same goes for severity, where we
now also allow additional values.
I
Hi WG,
again on the edit: I am replacing the few fixed facilities by a 4-digit
number right now. I wonder if it would still make sense to mention the
traditional facilities in -protocol. Same goes for severity, where we
now also allow additional values.
I would appreciate comments on this. For no
