Re: [sympy] Google Season of Docs 2023 announced

Hello Aaron and Sympy community, I am Anurag Bhat, a computer science student at Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur. I have been contributing to SymPy for the past year and had proposed for GSOC'22 with Sympy also. More about my work can be found here

[sympy] Searching for Potential Mentors: Expanding Symbolic Physics Control Module

Hello Everyone, I am Anurag Bhat, a third-year computer science student at IIT Jodhpur. I am quite familiar with SymPy and have been contributing to it for more than a year, here is a link to my work . Since members of the commun

[sympy] Re: Searching for Potential Mentors: Expanding Symbolic Physics Control Module

Dear Aaron and Jason, I would like to know your thoughts/views on it. If there are any potential mentors, I would gladly discuss my ideas with them and entertain any useful suggestions/feedback. Thanks and Regards, Anurag Bhat. On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 12:25:36 PM UTC+5:30 Anurag Surendra

[sympy] Re: Searching for Potential Mentors: Expanding Symbolic Physics Control Module

Hello SymPy Community, Here goes the proposal for the community to view. I have not updated it since last year. SymPy GSOC'22 Proposal - Google Docs *P.S*. - I would humbly request other interested candidates

[sympy] Re: Need GSoC mentors and help updating ideas page

Hello All, Having come across multiple students on personal mail and SymPy's mailing list interested in contributing and eventually proposing for the control module project, I have opened up an issue compiling all the ideas which I would like to be worked upon for GSoC'24. It contains all the la

Re: [sympy] Regarding reviewing of proposal in physics.control

Hi Abhishek, I went over all the ideas and they look well researched to me. Personally, I would prefer if the idea - "Add a symbolic solver (and a numeric solver if required) with the help of the existing ODE module to solve x' = Ax + Bu form that to *return the symbolic evaluation of the syste

Re: [sympy] Regarding reviewing of proposal in physics.control

Sorry I pressed post message by mistake. Continuing the reply here - Hi Abhishek, I went over all the ideas and they look well researched to me. Personally, I would prefer if the idea - "Add a symbolic solver (and a numeric solver if required) with the help of the existing ODE module to solve