[sympy] Need GSoC mentors and help updating ideas list

2025-01-27 Thread Aaron Meurer
The GSoC organization applications are now open. We need to go through our ideas page and update it. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas Please feel free to edit that page and delete old ideas that are no longer relevant and add new ones. Each idea needs to fit into one of the project

Re: [sympy] Blog post on NUMFOCUS concerns

2025-01-27 Thread Aaron Meurer
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 1:40 AM Jason Moore wrote: > > Hi, > > I was browsing Paul Invanov's blog today and came across this article: > > https://pirsquared.org/blog/numfocus-concerns.html > > We are part of NUMFOCUS, so I'd say it is important to at least be aware of > this. I do not have an opi

Re: [sympy] Blog post on NUMFOCUS concerns

2025-01-27 Thread Jason Moore
Dear Aaron, Paul does raise numerous specific issues in his post and just saying "there is nothing to worry about" doesn't allay any concerns that may form from reading his post, at least not for me. If you look at existing organizations that are 501(c)(6) orgs, none really give off any warm fuzzy

Re: [sympy] Blog post on NUMFOCUS concerns

2025-01-27 Thread Oscar Benjamin
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 22:21, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > There's also, separately, the question of the quality of LLM generated > code. I think that we need to use the GitHub review process we have > always been using to ensure the SymPy code remains high quality > regardless of its source. This mean

Re: [sympy] Blog post on NUMFOCUS concerns

2025-01-27 Thread Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:09 PM Jason Moore wrote: > > Dear Aaron, > > Paul does raise numerous specific issues in his post and just saying "there > is nothing to worry about" doesn't allay any concerns that may form from > reading his post, at least not for me. If you look at existing organizat

Re: [sympy] Blog post on NUMFOCUS concerns

2025-01-27 Thread Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:18 PM Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 22:21, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > > > There's also, separately, the question of the quality of LLM generated > > code. I think that we need to use the GitHub review process we have > > always been using to ensure the Sy