Sure, I will consider it! As i was mentioning in the other reply, i am also
going to reach out to Davide Sandonà (since he is responsible for the
module) and coordinate with them. Thanks for the help!
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 10:56 PM Alan Bromborsky
wrote:
> If you are going to improve plotting p
Sure, I'm going to reach out to him and see if there is some work i can
pick up! Thanks a lot!
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 10:52:15 PM UTC+1 asme...@gmail.com wrote:
> I didn't realize that idea was on there. I don't know if it's that
> important to get pyglet working. There are better plot
Sure, I am going to reach out to him and ask for more details.Thanks a lot!
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 10:56:40 PM UTC+1 brombo wrote:
> If you are going to improve plotting please consider an interface to
> Asymptote -
>
> https://asymptote.sourceforge.io/
>
> On 2/2/23 4:51 PM, Aaron Meu
If you are going to improve plotting please consider an interface to
Asymptote -
https://asymptote.sourceforge.io/
On 2/2/23 4:51 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
I didn't realize that idea was on there. I don't know if it's that
important to get pyglet working. There are better plotting backends
that
I didn't realize that idea was on there. I don't know if it's that
important to get pyglet working. There are better plotting backends
that we could be using.
If you're interested in working on the plotting module, you might want
to look at the new module written by Davide Sandonà
https://github.c
