Yes, we have permission to do an update of the ISV (including the
addition of the OT). I just haven't had time recently to work on it,
since it's a relatively difficult conversion (from a Word file).
--Chris
On 9/16/11 8:54 AM, Martin Denham wrote:
A user has asked regarding the ISV Old Testa
Hi everybody,
Just wanted to make you aware that there has been a very long and heated
discussion over the inclusion of SWORD into the official openSUSE repos in the
last couple of days. It can be read through here:
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2011-09/msg00422.html
I did not pa
The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
03532
3532 Nikolaos nik-ol'-ah-os from 3534 and *2994*; victorious over the
people
Hi
I've just submitted the updated module to be posted on the beta website.
Attached here is the list of errors and corrections that was made to it.
ChiPinYinErrors
Description: Binary data
שלום
Yau Onn___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@cross
Your reported observations about the discussion seem to confirm the
sentiments expressed by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
So what's new?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Discussion-on-sword-inclusion-on-openSUSE-mailing-list-tp3819944p38
There are two editions of the ISV (for the CadreBible version, at least).
* The free ISV edition without footnotes or maps
* The premium ISV edition with footnotes and maps
Presumably, you have the MS Word file for the free edition only (so far)?
Do you (or does anyone on this list) have direct
Nice reminder! I did know about that "law" some time ago. Still, is there
anything that can be done to make things clearer, like standard texts for
packagers etc.?
This was not just about silly Nazi comparisons. There were severe
misunderstandings here, and a potentially misleading package des
On 9/17/11 4:52 AM, David Haslam wrote:
There are two editions of the ISV (for the CadreBible version, at least).
* The free ISV edition without footnotes or maps
* The premium ISV edition with footnotes and maps
Presumably, you have the MS Word file for the free edition only (so far)?
Form
Martin Denham writes:
> The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
> sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
> Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
> 3532 Nikolaos nik-ol'-ah-os from 3534 and *2994*; v
Your list includes:
Did you follow the examples given in the wiki page?
http://crosswire.org/wiki/OSIS_Bibles#Marking_Notes
e.g. Especially for cross-reference notes.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Chinese-Pinyin-bible-tp3803241p3820175.html
Se
Did you review the versification for the ChiPinyin module?
cf. The latest modules ChiUn & ChiUns in CrossWire Av11n now use
Versification=NRSV
Running emptyvss on the ChiPinyin module v1.080413 from Xiphos output 841
lines, only 35 of which were because of Mark 3 being missing. See attached
htt
Your list also included
It's strange that the original module had a mismatch between the number of
and tags.
How did you resolve this difference?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Chinese-Pinyin-bible-tp3803241p3820210.html
Sent from the SWORD
On 9/17/11 5:55 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Martin Denham writes:
The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
3532 Niko
Chris Little writes:
> I just checked two print editions of Strong's, from different dates &
> publishers. Both have the correct 2992, so I think it's safe to
> correct. It's at least reasonable to assume your print edition is from the
> same publisher as these texts' print source, though.
FWIW,
Hi Nick,
Thanks! I'm using the new app on my iPad this morning. ;-)
Any chance of Gen Book support soon?
Many, many thanks.
Blessings,
Jeff
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/PocketSword-for-iPad-tp3800546p3820335.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archi
On 9/17/2011 8:55 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Martin Denham writes:
The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
3532 Nikol
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 08:55:19AM -0400, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Martin Denham writes:
> > The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
> > sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
> > Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is t
On 17 September 2011 12:56, Benjamin Misja wrote:
> Nice reminder! I did know about that "law" some time ago. Still, is there
> anything that can be done to make things clearer, like standard texts for
> packagers etc.?
Example wording:
"sword - a shared library and utilities to read and process
On 17/09/2011, at 3:07 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> This was the core argument against making indices distributable and
> downloadable.
I know that this has the potential for some issues, and I have engineered this
into PS so that when we move clucene versions, I can hit a switch and
invalid
19 matches
Mail list logo
