[sword-devel] Install Manager HTTP question...

2009-10-01 Thread Nic Carter
Hi there team. :) So, apparently HTTP isn't really supported with the SWORD InstallMgr... I've been looking around & trying to figure out what is missing & I've discovered that there seems to be a sorta-framework for HTTP in there, but it's half done... I'm looking at what is required

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread David Haslam
John, Are you working directly in OSIS, or using USFM and then converting? Presumably the text you are working on is the Irish ABN. Thanks to Kahunapule Michael Johnson in PNG, the KJV is available in USFM format (including deuterocanon) at http://ebible.org/bible/kjv/kjvsf.zip http://ebible.or

[sword-devel] Offline Bible

2009-10-01 Thread Nathan Kitchen
Hi. I've been working on a Bible project for the last year or so and happened to show it to a friend at church. He suggested that the sword mailing list may be interested in it as you have put together a variety of different Bible readers already. Although it's still very much under development (an

[sword-devel] OSIS feature support and questions

2009-10-01 Thread Brian J. Dumont
Hi all, I'm preparing a commentary in OSIS, and have some feature requests : * OSIS tables * additional hi types: small-caps, underline, super, sub (small-caps is most important of these, but I'd appreciate all four) * markers. When processed, these currently add a generic dou

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread johnduffy
David, The file was converted manually to USFM, with initial help from Daniel Owens, who also suggested that I use Bibledit to convert to OSIS. Thanks for the link to the KJVA. It allows me to see the 81 books instead of the 73 that I have been working on. The Greek Esther and Daniel extracts

[sword-devel] quoting sword modules

2009-10-01 Thread Arthur Bolstad
I am using a sword module (ASV) to create my quotes for a paper (book actually). How does one enter a sword module in the bibliography? Thanks Art Bolstad ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listin

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread Greg Hellings
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:33 AM, wrote: > David, > > The file was converted manually to USFM, with initial help from Daniel > Owens, who also suggested that I use Bibledit to convert to OSIS. Thanks > for the link to the KJVA. It allows me to see the 81 books instead of the > 73 that I have bee

Re: [sword-devel] Offline Bible

2009-10-01 Thread David Haslam
I just installed it in Firefox 3.0.14 under Windows XP, along with Google Gears. The navigation method is novel, and makes a refreshing change from dropdown menus or trees of folders. Looks promising! This is my personal view - other CrossWire volunteers will form their own opinions. What licen

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread johnduffy
Greg, I've been aware of the change up to v1.6, which is why I was a bit confused with not being able to download it. I'm only using Windows and the default Windows version is 1.5.11. I wouldn't know where to start to get Linux working. Is it fair to say that I cannot use alt v11n in Windows a

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread David Haslam
I think those of us who are Windows users are regarded as "poor cousins" by some CrossWire programmers. :confused: I've been wondering for several months when someone would compile 1.6 for us so we could just download the Win32 binary. David Haslam http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/User:David_Hasla

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread Chris Little
johndu...@cgcf.net wrote: 1 Is there a KJVA Bible that I can download or obtain for Sword (v1.5.11) or Bibledit (or other program to view a Sword module)? I'd like to check the v11n etc. I just realized that I haven't yet posted any demo v11n modules for anything other than the Leningra

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread Barry Drake
Hi there David Haslam wrote: I've been wondering for several months when someone would compile 1.6 for us so we could just download the Win32 binary. Keep an eye on the other cross platform frontends. Some of those may very well soon offer a Windows binary which links with 1.6 befo

Re: [sword-devel] Help wanted on non-canonical text

2009-10-01 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Sorry David, You had asked for this a while ago. If it was as simple as recompiling against 1.6 to get v11n support, we would have done so already. BibleCS does indeed compile against 1.6, and what is in SVN is also ALMOST av11n aware. I wanted BibleCS to take advantage of the av11n features of

[sword-devel] Windows users as "poor cousins"? (was: Help wanted on non-canonical text )

2009-10-01 Thread Jonathan Marsden
David Haslam wrote: I think those of us who are Windows users are regarded as "poor cousins" by some CrossWire programmers. :confused: I think you may have that somewhat backwards. CrossWire itself makes its source code available for download to everyone with Internet access, Linux and Wind

Re: [sword-devel] Windows users as "poor cousins"? (was: Help wanted on non-canonical text )

2009-10-01 Thread Greg Hellings
I think there's a second perspective you can look at it from, which is in David's mind On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > David Haslam wrote: > > I think those of us who are Windows users are regarded as "poor >> cousins" by some CrossWire programmers. :confused: >> > > I

Re: [sword-devel] Windows users as "poor cousins"?

2009-10-01 Thread Chris Little
Greg Hellings wrote: On another hand, one could also point out that autotools is native to the SWORD library, is regularly updated when file names, directory structures and the like change. Thus, at any given point, a user could just pull the SVN tree and have a very high probability of things

Re: [sword-devel] Windows users as "poor cousins"?

2009-10-01 Thread Matthew Talbert
>> There are also file system paths on Windows which had not been tested, >> then were found to mishandle unicode.  Last I heard, this was not resolved >> -- though I understand that it works fine in Linux. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that was an issue with Xiphos on > Win32. I don't