> On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:37, Jerry Hastings wrote:
> > At 12:19 AM 9/1/2002 +0200, Daniel Freedman wrote:
> >> Also I don't think its necessary to state that Sword is "for windows"
>
> > As I understand it, the "for Windows" is to distinguish it from "The
SWORD
> > Project" and from the SWORD lib..
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:37, Jerry Hastings wrote:
> At 12:19 AM 9/1/2002 +0200, Daniel Freedman wrote:
>> Also I don't think its necessary to state that Sword is "for windows"
> As I understand it, the "for Windows" is to distinguish it from "The SWORD
> Project" and from the SWORD lib.. For Window
At 12:19 AM 9/1/2002 +0200, Daniel Freedman wrote:
>Also I don't think its necessary to state that Sword is "for windows"
As I understand it, the "for Windows" is to distinguish it from "The SWORD
Project" and from the SWORD lib.. For Windows is fine with me.
Jerry
Nice work, I must admit I like what Avihai has done, although i do think the
icons in the first image need to be text-independent
Also I don't think its necessary to state that Sword is "for windows"
Version no. is more appropriate
but otherwise looking good, again I'd like it if it was more com
Jerry,
NO! Don't worry. 1.5.4 features are now frozen. There shouldn't be any
significant changes before release. Avihai.H took the time to create
and submitted these images and I wanted people to comment on them. I'm
sure we will have many debates about issues before we would fina
The images are very nice. There are a lot of screen shots in the help files
that will need to be redone if you change the looks now. That is not a big
problem but it will add some time.
Jerry
At 04:23 PM 8/29/2002 -0700, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>Here are a few images sent in from Avihai.H
>Le
