On 08/13/2012 11:02 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 11:09 PM, David Haslam wrote:
>> The relevant paragraph is,
>>
>> "In USFM, character level markup can be nested (embedded) within a paragraph
>> element, or another character element, but (depending on the way in which
>> the markers are
On 08/13/2012 11:09 PM, David Haslam wrote:
The relevant paragraph is,
"In USFM, character level markup can be nested (embedded) within a paragraph
element, or another character element, but (depending on the way in which
the markers are written) does not necessarily cancel out the previous
mark
On 08/13/2012 08:09 PM, David Haslam wrote:
> The relevant paragraph is,
>
> "In USFM, character level markup can be nested (embedded) within a paragraph
> element, or another character element, but (depending on the way in which
> the markers are written) does not necessarily cancel out the previo
The relevant paragraph is,
"In USFM, character level markup can be nested (embedded) within a paragraph
element, or another character element, but (depending on the way in which
the markers are written) does not necessarily cancel out the previous
marker's attributes. Paratext (a UBS translation e
On 08/13/2012 08:18 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
I thought it would be odd for USFM to quietly deprecate explicit style end
markers in footnotes. I checked again, and it didn't.
In http://ubs-icap.org/chm/usfm/2.35/index.html?syntax_notes.htm ending a style
with another style and with
