On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:07 AM, Chris Little wrote:
> On 6/3/2013 2:20 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Chris Little
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the message in which I would say that scope gets rejected:
>>> http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/2012-February/037148.html
On 6/3/2013 2:20 PM, DM Smith wrote:
On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Chris Little
wrote:
This is the message in which I would say that scope gets rejected:
http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/2012-February/037148.html
I certainly didn't read it that way.
None of Troy's concerns
On 04/06/2013, at 7:20 AM, DM Smith wrote:
>> None of Troy's concerns are addressed,
>
> Troy merely listed a few things and said he didn't like each. He didn't say
> why so there was no opportunity for further discussion.
hehe – when the gatekeeper for an opensource project doesn't like an i
On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> On 6/3/2013 5:55 AM, DM Smith wrote:
>> I saw that Scope was yanked from the wiki with a comment that it had
>> been rejected. I really don't remember it being rejected. I just
>> remember that the discussion never went anywhere so it was dropped
