Hi Lynn,
Thanks for the report. You might consider subscribing to [sword-cvs]
to keep an eye on what is changing in the repository.
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-cvs
(I realize we use SVN-- the list name is legacy).
I've been actively working on these files and updating the BC
Troy wrote:
> biblecs/CBuilder6/swordprj.bpg in BCB6 and choosing Project|Build
All
> Projects
>
> This should produce a working executable. It does for me on a CLEAN
> system. Please let me know if you CONFIRM that it does not for you.
As of May 3, using biblecs rev 415 from svn (HEAD), there i
My apologies, I misinterpreted your previous message in the same way
that Lynn did, since that's the more common angle from which the "GPL
and Win32 system libraries are not compatible" argument is made.
But my second paragraph ("This is a non-issue.") still stands.
For the sake of argument, let
I wrote:
> Relevant threads from other lists/forums on this topic I have seen include:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss%40opensource.org/msg07548.html
> (in particular see
> http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss%40opensource.org/msg07550.html
> and
> http://www.mail-archive.co
Chris Little wrote:
> Lynn is entirely correct. GPL specifically allows for system libraries.
> MFC is a system library, therefore allowed.
(Not surprisingly, I didn't happen to obtain a law degree within the past 5
hours, so I'm still not a lawyer!)
My understanding from what I have read (even
Lynn is entirely correct. GPL specifically allows for system libraries.
MFC is a system library, therefore allowed.
This is a non-issue.
--Chris
Lynn Allan wrote:
(standard IANAL disclaimer)
MFC is probably not an option. The Visual Studio .NET 2003 license
names MFC
as a "Redistributable", and
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Borland moving to Eclipse: Borland has always supported Eclipse and
has just continued that support and plan to offer their customers a
choice of this free ide for their enterprise components. However,
their Java IDE is far superior (sorry DM, it's so true),
Them's fi
Regarding licensing issues: just because we use the GPL doesn't mean
WE'RE restricted by it. We own the code and can add a clause similar
to: "linking against the .NET library is OK" :)
Having said this. My intent is to continue to use the best tools
available (Borland, of course), for develo
Lynn Allan wrote:
BCB6 Personal isn't reasonable for development purposes. The
personal
version can't be used for debugging, making it basically useless. We
try
to maintain the BCB6 projects so that people can compile projects
that
have already been developed and debugged and maybe for people who
> (standard IANAL disclaimer)
>
> MFC is probably not an option. The Visual Studio .NET 2003 license
names MFC
> as a "Redistributable", and then says,
Also IANAL ... [note: I've asked questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
gotten answers in layman's English ... perhaps we should ask
specifically abo
DNR wrote:
> Chris Little wrote:
> > A new from-scratch .NET/MFC-type app or a QT4 port of BibleTime (once
> > QT4 for Win32 is released) would be better options, I think.
>
> Dev C++ has a nice ide, and uses the Mingw port of gcc.
> http://www.bloodshed.net/
> I believe that the source for MFC is
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Chris Little wrote:
Maybe we should take up a collection to buy Troy a copy of BCB6 so we
can all move forward and abandon BCB5 as the supported platform. On
the other hand, I think I can state accurately that BCB6 is going to
be the last supported Borland C++ environmen
> BCB6 Personal isn't reasonable for development purposes. The
personal
> version can't be used for debugging, making it basically useless. We
try
> to maintain the BCB6 projects so that people can compile projects
that
> have already been developed and debugged and maybe for people who
want
> to s
Hi there
Chris Little wrote:
The same libsword project file is used for both BibleCS and utilities
builds, so it's not that. I suspect that it's a matter of the
utilities needing classes (e.g. filters to formats other than RTF)
that are not used by BibleCS but that are used by the u
Chris Little wrote:
A new from-scratch .NET/MFC-type app or a QT4 port of BibleTime (once
QT4 for Win32 is released) would be better options, I think.
Dev C++ has a nice ide, and uses the Mingw port of gcc.
http://www.bloodshed.net/
I believe that the source for MFC is available with th
Krzysztof Bialas wrote:
Chris,
BCB6 is freely available with a personal license - and such can be used
as long as sword is not involved in commercial activity (I do not know
whether it still holds or how long it will hold).
BCB6 Personal isn't reasonable for development purposes. The personal
v
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Chris Little wrote:
To clarify, I believe Troy is confirming that BibleCS builds fine
using BCB6. I don't think he's making a statement about building the
utils, which may still need project work.
Yes. Chris has correctly stated my position that I have not had time
ye
al Message -
From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Information for beginning Windows BCB 6
Developers
Chris Little wrote:
To clarify, I believe Tr
input file: \
-
Greetings
Christopher.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Information for beginning Windows BCB 6
Dev
ay, April 18, 2005 6:01 AM
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Information for beginning Windows BCB 6
Developers
Hi there
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
BCB6 compilation should NOT require any downloading of packages
outside of our 3 SVN repos: sword, ic
Behalf Of Barry Drake
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 6:01 AM
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Information for beginning Windows BCB 6
Developers
Hi there
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
BCB6 compilation should NOT require any downloading of packages
outside o
Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
BCB6 compilation should NOT require any downloading of packages
outside of our 3 SVN repos: sword, icu-sword, biblecs.
I cleaned out all the SVN stuff from my box and took a clean SVN
checkout at 8.30 am GMT this morning. The
e, but it
does not connect.
Paul Pham
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Drake
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 6:01 AM
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Information for beginning Windows BCB 6
Developers
Hi there
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
BCB6 compilation should NOT require any downloading of packages
outside of our 3 SVN repos: sword, icu-sword, biblecs.
I cleaned out all the SVN stuff from my box and took a clean SVN
checkout at 8.30 am GMT this morning. The whole thing built 'st
Hey guys. Thanks for the time investigating this. My apologies for
being scarce this weekend. I hope to get caught up with things early in
the week, but wanted to post a quick note.
BCB6 compilation should NOT require any downloading of packages outside
of our 3 SVN repos: sword, icu-sword,
> The tutorials work, but when you exit, you'll probably get an
> exception because in filemgr.cpp, FileMgr::close() the global "files"
> has a value of 00010 in it at exit, and it causes a Memory exception
> as the system tries to reference an invalid address. I've had to
> ignore this error. I
Hi there ...
Wade Maxfield wrote:
This is a compilation of notes to hopefully assist beginning
developers in the Windows Environment.
Thanks for this. I was going to write something like it myself when
(if) I finally get it fully working. First, can I say that there's a
free package
27 matches
Mail list logo
