Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

> > In His Name. > > Johan > > > -Original Message- > From: Johan Marais [mailto:johan.mar...@messianic.co.za] > Sent: 25 October 2010 07:42 PM > To: 'Peter von Kaehne'; sword-devel@crosswire.org > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iP

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

Any suggestions please? In His Name. Johan -Original Message- From: Johan Marais [mailto:johan.mar...@messianic.co.za] Sent: 25 October 2010 07:42 PM To: 'Peter von Kaehne'; sword-devel@crosswire.org Subject: Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos Go

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

Good evening, Once again, thank you for your help. I have copied your suggestion into my text, but when clicking on Isa. 7:14, it takes me to Rev. 1:14 - this is in Xiphos 3.1.3 for Windows. There is no option on the iPhone to select Isa. 7:14. Any suggestions? In His Name, Johan -Ori

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

unsubscribe On 10/24/10, Johan Marais wrote: > > Thank you Peter and Karl, > > I copied the Esther example from the OSIS manual into my text and the > results are as follows: > > Looks correct in Xiphos (Windows), i.e. the text reference (Ezra 4:6) is in > the footnote and I can click on it and i

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

Thank you Peter and Karl, I copied the Esther example from the OSIS manual into my text and the results are as follows: Looks correct in Xiphos (Windows), i.e. the text reference (Ezra 4:6) is in the footnote and I can click on it and it takes me to the correct text. On my iPhone though, the f

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:14 -0500, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Rapier is in Extra-Testing; and Katana is in Extra-Devel (not sure > why it isn't in testing) -- Both apps are stable and run fine. Thanks, I found and installed both of them. Nice work! Teus

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

From: Teus Benschop [mailto:teusjanne...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:18 PM To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum Subject: Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900 On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:43 -0500, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Just a FYI; there is two native N900 apps; R

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:43 -0500, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Just a FYI; there is two native N900 apps; Rapier (Python) and > Katana (C++) using the sword library. They are actually build for the n900 > handling. That is very helpful, thank you. I failed to find any of these applications in

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

Teus, Just a FYI; there is two native N900 apps; Rapier (Python) and Katana (C++) using the sword library. They are actually build for the n900 handling. Nathan -Original Message- From: Teus Benschop [mailto:teusjanne...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:40 PM To:

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword is dead. Long live Xiphos.

David Haslam writes: > This has a link to GnomeSword that will eventually require updating or > replacing. There are many links both in Sword and elsewhere that will need to be updated. We'll see about it once we've got the 3.0 release out. Until then, GnomeSword is the name of existing softwar

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword is dead. Long live Xiphos.

This has a link to GnomeSword that will eventually require updating or replacing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_SWORD_Project#External_links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_SWORD_Project#External_links -- David jhphx wrote: > > Karl wrote: >> ... The name chosen by a >> committee of ab

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword is dead. Long live Xiphos.

Karl wrote: ... The name chosen by a committee of about a dozen is Xiphos, ... Nice name. There is a Xiphos.com, Project Xiphos, and a Xiphos font. Jerry ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/list

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

David Haslam wrote: > Clicking on http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp > http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp > > just caused > > > HTTP Status 500 - Sorted ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailma

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

Clicking on http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp just caused HTTP Status 500 - type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () t

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

Hi, On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: >> The software list are still quite long (but much shorter) and the >> screenshots are still there. There are different opinions here regarding >> the suitability of screenshot

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > The software list are still quite long (but much shorter) and the > screenshots are still there. There are different opinions here regarding > the suitability of screenshots (i.e Troy thinks they should stay, others > think they should go)

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

Anyone contemplating making Presentations or Tutorials about Windows [or Linux] programs should take a look at http://www.debugmode.com/wink/ Wink . Wink is a Tutorial and Presentation creation software, primarily aimed at creating tutorials on how to use software (like a tutor for MS-Word/Excel

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

Am 01.12.2008 um 21:30 schrieb Daniel Glassey: > 2008/12/1 Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Matthew Talbert wrote: >> >>> Also, perhaps a demonstration of where all they can get help. The >>> manual, mailing list, irc. >> >> I'm not in a position to tell you what to do,

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

Hi Daniel, are you still the maintainer of the libsword and bibletime packages in Debian? mg On Monday 01 December 2008 21:30:03 Daniel Glassey wrote: > 2008/12/1 Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Matthew Talbert wrote: > >> Also, perhaps a demonstration of where all th

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

2008/12/1 Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Matthew Talbert wrote: > >> Also, perhaps a demonstration of where all they can get help. The >> manual, mailing list, irc. > > I'm not in a position to tell you what to do, but the topic is > interesting and useful for other softw

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

Peter von Kaehne wrote: > BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. > > E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being > installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, > I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandl

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

Manfred Bergmann wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source > of dominique.corbex. > The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library > which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher version > number). > Any ideas

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

Manfred Bergmann wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source > of dominique.corbex. > The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library > which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher version > number). > Any ideas

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

work. --- On Fri, 11/21/08, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 > To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" > Date: Friday, November 21, 2008,

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:43 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: > All right, thanks. > Are you working on a 8.10 compatible package? > > > Manfred I'm working on a debian unstable compatible package but a backport to 8.10 will be easy. --domcox ___ swor

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:56 +, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. > > E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being > installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, > I guess the majority of

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

Peter von Kaehne wrote: > BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. > > E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being > installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, > I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandl

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandline and apache is a bit of an ove

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Jonathan Morgan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Peter von Kaehne wrote: >>> Matthew Talbert wrote: I do not get this in linux. It looks exactly like the windows screenshot for me. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? >>> More right th

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

All right, thanks. Are you working on a 8.10 compatible package? Manfred Am 21.11.2008 um 13:33 schrieb Dominique Corbex: > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:32 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source >> of dominique.corbex. >> Th

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter von Kaehne wrote: >> Matthew Talbert wrote: > >>> I do not get this in linux. It looks exactly like the windows >>> screenshot for me. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? >> >> More right that wrong, given that we h

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:32 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source > of dominique.corbex. > The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library > which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a high

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Hi Tonny, Karl has already answered a good deal, so I keep it short. Tonny Kohar wrote: > Hi Peter > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Peter von Kaehne wrote: >>> I will upload somewhere a Ubuntu screenshot for how it is looking here. >> >> http:/

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

"Tonny Kohar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - Is that the shifting of GUI (the whole things) is the correct > behaviour of RTL locale (I mean the GUI flow/shifting) ? The idea is that the "leading side" of RtoL interfaces is on the right. GTK takes charge of this, based on $LC_ALL for known RtoL l

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Hi Peter On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter von Kaehne wrote: >> >> I will upload somewhere a Ubuntu screenshot for how it is looking here. > > > http://www.crosswire.org/~refdoc/private/Screenshot-Persian%20Holy%20Bible%20(Tarjumeh-ye%20Ghadeem)%2

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Peter von Kaehne wrote: > Matthew Talbert wrote: >> I do not get this in linux. It looks exactly like the windows >> screenshot for me. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? > > More right that wrong, given that we had no Gnomesword on windows until > 5 hours ago. But given that plenty of words are

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Matthew Talbert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> How's this? >> Er, spoke too soon. It does show both RtoL text and Farsi digits, but >> it didn't turn the interface around. See, in Linux, wh

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How's this? > > Er, spoke too soon. It does show both RtoL text and Farsi digits, but > it didn't turn the interface around. See, in Linux, when you do that, > you get t

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

> I used mmap() because it was totally trivial: I just wanted to inhale > the file into a buffer I could chew on. Once I had the file open, one > mmap() gave me its content. > > A replacement stdio solution won't be any challenge, of course. To be > done this evening or tomorrow. Could you also

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Matthew Talbert wrote: >> Not correct unfortunately. >> >> The translated texts (fewer than I remmeber I had done, but that is a >> separate matter) are displayed correctly, but the overall orientation of >> the programme is wrong - everything should re-order itself right to >> left, which was what

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

> Not correct unfortunately. > > The translated texts (fewer than I remmeber I had done, but that is a > separate matter) are displayed correctly, but the overall orientation of > the programme is wrong - everything should re-order itself right to > left, which was what stunned us all on Gnomesword

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How's this? > > Lovely. Not correct unfortunately. The translated texts (fewer than I remmeber I had done, but that is a separate matter) are displayed correctly, but the overall orientation of the programme is wrong - eve

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How's this? Lovely. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How's this? Er, spoke too soon. It does show both RtoL text and Farsi digits, but it didn't turn the interface around. See, in Linux, when you do that, you get the sidebar on the right and commentary on the left, with main menus on the right as wel

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5270767376254691490 >> It looks like it does in Ubuntu (I think, but the fonts are >> different), except the numbers are on the right in Windows. This works great. Thanks!

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

> Now, if you can invoke GnomeSword with the Windows equivalent of > "LC_ALL=fa_IR", so as to see it turn the *entire* interface around to > RtoL, that would be even cooler. Again, I expect it to just work, right > down to Farsi digits in the Bible display and navbar spinners. How's this? http:

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5270767376254691490 > It looks like it does in Ubuntu (I think, but the fonts are > different), except the numbers are on the right in Windows. Oh, yeah, that's right. I (for one) didn't expect other

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you do me a favour and check out whether Farsi or Arabic modules work? > > One of the problems I found on all Windows platforms was that RtoL > modules were displayed the wrong way round. > > AraSVD and FarsiOPV a

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Could you do me a favour and check out whether Farsi or Arabic modules work? One of the problems I found on all Windows platforms was that RtoL modules were displayed the wrong way round. AraSVD and FarsiOPV are in the repositories. Thansk so much Peter Matthew Talbert wrote: >> I see that yo

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know if speed is the reason mmap is being used or not I used mmap() because it was totally trivial: I just wanted to inhale the file into a buffer I could chew on. Once I had the file open, one mmap() gave me its content. A replacement stdi

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

> I see that you have no language divisions known in the module list. > This is because of something you mentioned before, that there is no > mmap() call available. I will re-work the language init code to use > more bland stdio calls to get the language data. Yes, that is correct. I was a little

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do have a prettier picture now though :) I see that you have no language divisions known in the module list. This is because of something you mentioned before, that there is no mmap() call available. I will re-work the language init code to use mo

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brilliant! > > Is there a binary anywhere for download? Not at the moment. I will have to untangle it from my mingw setup first. I do have a prettier picture now though :) http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gno

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

Brilliant! Is there a binary anywhere for download? Peter Matthew Talbert wrote: > I have successfully compiled Sword and Gnomesword with mingw on Windows. You > can see a screenshot here: > > http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5270746858482217858 > > Naturally there is lots of

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > successfully compiled Sword and Gnomesword with mingw on Windows. Woo-hoo! No doubt there's lots yet to be done. but...WOW. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4.1

"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe for future releases, if Gecko on Solaris still > doesn't work properly, you could add an exception to the autotools for > Solaris so it defaults to gtkhtml on that system? Yes, I probably should have already done that. After all, we default to g

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4.1

Karl On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I released 2.4.1 a little while ago. > > - F1-F4 shortcuts (help, prefs, adv.search, mod.mgr) > - companion modules > - automatic font selection > - fix: mod.mgr lockout problems > - fix: search range infloop in lexd

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

Thanks for the quick reply! I installed this module gnomesword_2.4.0-1_i386.deb and thought incorrectly that Sword was included, After installing libsword6_1.5.11-0hardy1_i386.deb

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

Sent from my iPhone On Sep 26, 2008, at 19:35, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> error while loading shared libraries: libsword-1.5.11.so: cannot open >> shared object file: No such file or directory > > You don't have Sword itself installed firs

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > error while loading shared libraries: libsword-1.5.11.so: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory You don't have Sword itself installed first, so you've got a dependency error. ___ sword-devel mai

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

Thank you very much for the answer. I get this error when I try to run, error while loading shared libraries: libsword-1.5.11.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Karl Kleinpaste wrote: SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I installed it, now how do I run it? Ther

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > just has 2.3.6. > Or have I missed something blazingly obvious. At the moment, I'm having trouble getting updates into the project web pages at SourceForge, and I sent that before I had tried (failed) to upload the changes. /mutter/ shell.sourceforge.net is

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 20:27, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5528&package_id=104941&release_id=617337 just has 2.3.6. Or have I missed something blazingly obvious. Is this 32 bit or 64 bit? xan jonathon _

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

Congratulations and all the best from the BibleTime team! mg am Sonntag, 21. September 2008 um 20:27 schrieben Sie: > Out the door a few minutes ago. > We now consider GS to be out of "unstable" status. > http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ > ___ > swo

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed it, now how do I run it? There is no menu entry in gnome? > I am using Ubuntu 8.04. It installs its gnome desktop entry under Accessories. Otherwise, run it from the command line as "gnomesword2". ___

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

I installed it, now how do I run it? There is no menu entry in gnome? I am using Ubuntu 8.04. Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > Out the door a few minutes ago. > We now consider GS to be out of "unstable" status. > http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ > > ___ >

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] Ubuntu bundling modules

On Sun, 11 May 2008, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > This was brought up just now on sword-support by a user who could not > uninstall the Arabic Bible for which he had little use. > > I think we had discussed this a while ago and the discussion went > inconclusive. Some gthought is was a packaging bug,

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

Op woensdag 17-10-2007 om 20:36 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Troy A. Griffitts: > I agree with everything DM said, but I'm trying to picture any of our > 10s of thousands of windows users pulling up a list of genbooks and > seeing between Calvin's Commentaries and Duke Databank of Papyrii, the

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I honestly tried to find an email from me on sword-devel in Nov '06 to > help me remember my thoughts back then, but couldn't find the one you > mentioned. It wasn't discussed in email; you, DM, and I chatted about it in #sword several times that w

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

I agree with everything DM said, but I'm trying to picture any of our 10s of thousands of windows users pulling up a list of genbooks and seeing between Calvin's Commentaries and Duke Databank of Papyrii, the Gnomesword User's Manual. Do you see where I'm a little concerned that it seems out o

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

On Oct 17, 2007, at 8:34 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Do you think that the GnomeSword manual should be something that goes in the module repository? When we first discussed such things last November, I asked whether this would be something of

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

JSword converts the value to a number and if it is non-numeric, defaults it to 1.0. This behavior is based on the documentation on the conf at http://www.crosswire.org/sword/develop/swordmodule I mirrored that documentation at: http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/DevTools:Modules And base

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > As for Chris' observation about single-point version numbers, that's > news to me. I don't see why such an arbitrary restriction needs to be > in place, and if it's genuinely policy, then someone had better have a > chat with the folks at bible.org, because their reposit

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you think that the GnomeSword manual should be something that goes in > the module repository? When we first discussed such things last November, I asked whether this would be something of general utility; your comment at the time was, "I think

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

By the way, module version numbers can only have one point (e.g 2.3, not 2.3.1). If you want to keep parity with GS releases, you could use 2.31, assuming no portion of the release number will exceed 9. Troy's point that this should be packaged with GS, not in the module repository certainly ma

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

Karl, Do you think that the GnomeSword manual should be something that goes in the module repository? My initial thought is that the repository should contain material based on what it is, not necessarily what storage technology it uses. I would think you might include the manual in your softw

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Joachim Ansorg wrote: > Karl, > I just updated the Gnomesword manual in the beta area with the version you > supplied. > Please let me know if everything is working as expected. I tested it with the BibleTime svn version. It works as expected (including the pictures). With fa

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

Karl, I just updated the Gnomesword manual in the beta area with the version you supplied. Please let me know if everything is working as expected. Somebody else already did the update of bao.conf: Feature=Images Category=Maps It's not listed in the "Generic Books" section in the beta area, thou

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

All I meant was that the updated bao.conf needs to go with BAO currently in beta. Leave it in beta for a little while yet if needed. I'm not trying to push it to live status before the Windows UI understands it. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-deve

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > It would be appreciated if bao.conf could be propagated by someone with > privs to the Crosswire module area. We need to wait on that until the current release of BibleCS has working image support. I would imagine we'll just to a release of BibleCS 1.5.10 when the new

Re: [sword-devel] [Gnomesword-developers] doc images replaced

This might be useful, from swdisprtfchap.cpp in BibleCS: Just before iterating the module for display of a single chapter: VerseKey *key = (VerseKey *)(SWKey *)Module; key->Headings(1); testmt = key->Testament(); book = key->Book(); chap = key->Chapter(); v

Re: [sword-devel] [Gnomesword-developers] doc images replaced

On 11/11/06, Terry Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 10:27 -0500, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > > Thanx to Brian Dumont for sending me his copy of still-valid *.png for > > the documentation area. > > > > After looking them over, I realized they were for a much older release > > o

Re: [sword-devel] gnomeSword compilation

> Is 2.1.2 brand-new? I'd swear I had gotten 2.1.1 just the day > before from the same place. No its from May Mark ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/c

Re: [sword-devel] gnomeSword compilation

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:15:38PM +0100, Mark Trompell wrote: > > > Has anyone else gotten a recent GnomeSword to compile against a recent > > Sword toolkit? > > gnomesword-2.1.2 should compile with sword 1.5.8, you can get it at > http://sf.net/projects/gnomesword Yes, it compiles nicely, with

Re: [sword-devel] gnomeSword compilation

> Has anyone else gotten a recent GnomeSword to compile against a recent > Sword toolkit? gnomesword-2.1.2 should compile with sword 1.5.8, you can get it at http://sf.net/projects/gnomesword > Thanks! > > Fred Mark ___ sword-devel mailing list: sw

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword

On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 13:19 -0700, David wrote: > Who works on GnomeSword? Terry Biggs mainly. There is a gnomesword list on sourceforge. Mark ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword compile error

Benedykt P. Barszcz said: > perhaps anybody could help: > [snip] > -MF ".deps/sw_sword.Tpo" -c -o sw_sword.o sw_sword.cpp; \ > then mv -f ".deps/sw_sword.Tpo" ".deps/sw_sword.Po"; else rm -f > ".deps/sw_sword.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > /usr/include/sword/localemgr.h: In function `void > initSWORD(SETTINGS

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword compile error

Benedykt P. Barszcz said: > Ha, it's gnomesword. So this could've been the problem. I'll > give the gnomesword1 a try some time soon. You should definitely be using the gnomesword1 module from CVS as the other one is out of use. However, it is not likely to fix your problem as I'm having exactly

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword compile error

Andy Piper wrote: [...] Which CVS module did you grab for GnomeSword? The correct module is gnomesword1. [...] Ha, it's gnomesword. So this could've been the problem. I'll give the gnomesword1 a try some time soon. tnx Benedict ___ sword-devel mailing l

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword compile error

Benedykt P. Barszcz said: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnomesword]$ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7) > Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Hmm. I had wondered if this might have been a gcc-3.4 problem, but clearly not. > I am running Fedora Core 2 > I don't k

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword compile error

Andy Piper wrote: [...] What distribution or platform are you running on? Could this be a gcc issue? [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnomesword]$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7) Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I am running Fedora Core 2 I don't know what gnome ve

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword compile error

Benedykt P. Barszcz said: > perhaps anybody could help: Terry is away at the moment and I guess he would be the best person... hopefully somebody else here can come up with an answer. > 1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include > -I/usr/X11R6/include > -I/usr/include/gnome-1.0 -I/usr/i

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword VS libgtkhtml-3.0

On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 13:03, fredex wrote: > Trying to get Gnomesword (latest stable) running on my Tao Linux box. > Configure fails with: > > checking for libgnomeui-2.0 gtk+-2.0 libgtkhtml-3.0 gal-2.0 libxml-2.0 sword... > Package libgtkhtml-3.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Pe

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword-0.5.0 release

Chris, I see that you added Lang= tags to all modules now. Just that I understand: Which scheme/system did you use? You talked about the lang/country (e.g. en_US) scheme, but you didn't use it, right? How are the strange languages (e.g. xx_KET) covered now? Can moddsp.jsp now be modified to sor

RE: [sword-devel] gnomesword-0.5.0 release

Wow, this is great news. I was wondering when you would be releasing it, as I thought the screen shots looked beautiful. Once I finish downloading the latest ximian-gnome for my machine I will be downloading everything I need to get gnomesword-0.5.0 up and running. This is so great, thank yo

RE: [sword-devel] gnomesword-0.5.0 release

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Terry Biggs > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [sword-devel] gnomesword-0.5.0 release > > > Chris, > > Would it be possible to add Lang=grc to lxxm.conf > gnomesword kinda needs it? > >

RE: [sword-devel] gnomesword-0.5.0 release

Chris, Would it be possible to add Lang=grc to lxxm.conf gnomesword kinda needs it? -- Terry Rev 1:5 "...Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood."

RE: [sword-devel] gnomesword-0.5.0 release

Congratulations Terry! I've been meaning to check this out for a very long time. I don't think I've been able to get GnomeSword running since 0.3-something, but I just upgraded to Mandrake 8 recently so it should have everything I'll need to finally compile & test this out. Does GnomeSword real

Re: [sword-devel] gnomesword binary

Terry, I tried the one at the root of the CD. I seem to get missing jpeg library errors. I'm running on RH 7.1. I'll try to get it tested on another box to verify. Trying to get 1.5.2 out the door today for the Bibletime guys. I'll test your latest stuff against it also and see if I c