Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

Brian Fernandes wrote: > Daniel, Karl, Frank & Eeli > > Thanks for the protocol overview. Daniel, you mentioned someone (or you?) > played around with FF as the display engine. This is really the core of what > I'm doing. Any idea what happened to this effort? > That was a snippet from a pos

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

Brian, Joe Walker, one of the developers of JSword, has authored DWR (Direct Web Remoting) as a way to interface AJAX to server side java. You can see a demo of it working with JSword here: http://eireneh.com/studious/ This is a bit stale, using an old release of JSword. You might find

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

> > Yes, definitely going to add a search capability. But I need to spend more > time getting the basics right before going there. > > I'm definitely going to take this forward and will keep you guys posted as > soon as I have anything remotely usable. > > Thanks for your support, much appre

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

I'm pleasantly surprised by the number of replies I've received - and all positive to boot. I have never come across such a high volume dev list till date. Awesome. I will try and respond to all the questions I've received here. Jon >Looks nice. Strangely reminiscent of BibleDesktop (I wonder

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, DJ Ortley wrote: > Should we now discuss standardizing implementations? Are people in > favor of doing that? Yes, I would like to have more standards or recommendations for Sword. No need to re-invent the wheel, and it may even open some new cross-application possibilities l

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

We don't need to discuss it because it has already been defined, I believe fairly exhaustively. I would guess we discussed it 4-5 years ago. If anyone wants to, I'm sure it would be appreciated if the private protocol details were copied from the email archives into the wiki. --Chris DJ Ortle

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

Daniel Blake wrote: Sounds interesting, Brian. Reading your post reminded me of a discussion earlier this year. I searched and found the thread I remembered. It talks about individually implemented Sword protocols. I was going to put a link to the thread in the sword-devel Archives

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

Should we now discuss standardizing implementations? Are people in favor of doing that? -DJ On Dec 10, 2007 10:02 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Reading your post reminded me of a > > discussion earlier this year. I searched and fou

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

Daniel Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Reading your post reminded me of a > discussion earlier this year. I searched and found the thread I > remembered. It talks about individually implemented Sword protocols. ... > GnomeSword - sword:// > "GS understands "sword://ModuleName/KeyIntoThatModul

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

Sounds interesting, Brian. Reading your post reminded me of a discussion earlier this year. I searched and found the thread I remembered. It talks about individually implemented Sword protocols. I was going to put a link to the thread in the sword-devel Archives

Re: [sword-devel] Firefox front-end

I think its very cool. Actually, I'd probably use it quite a bit. I'm always in FF, and don't like firing up BibleDesktop if I want to do a quick reference check. If it can be gotten to work with other texts as well, I'd probably be even more interested as there are some other texts that I common