Don,
thanks for th update!
I added the stuff to paralleldisplay.jsp.
I can't figure out how to tell using CSS to make each column to have the same
width. The number of columns is variable, you know.
I decided to add the dir= attribute to tell what direction we have to format
the text depending
Message -
> From: "David Cary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface - Scripture Markup
>
>
> >
> > Dear Don A. Elbourne Jr.,
> >
> > That looks
alone,
Don A. Elbourne Jr.
http://elbourne.org
- Original Message -
From: "David Cary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface - Scripture Markup
>
> Dear Don A. Elbourne Jr.
At 16:28 25-03-03 -0600, David Cary wrote:
Occasionally I see text that cannot
be placed into a strict hierarchy (there's overlapping sections,
paragraphs, and verses).
This is quite common, actually, especially when you look at many
translations in many languages. There are basically three hiera
Dear Don A. Elbourne Jr.,
That looks like a perfectly adequate structure. Naturally I would like to
add <... id="6:29" > anchors to each verse so I can make a link jump right
to the 29th verse.
Going to Print http://www.alistapart.com/stories/goingtoprint/ has a nifty
way to make every link v
On 05-Mar-2003 Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> Here is the second page of my Sword Web Interface mock-up. Its the idea I
> have for what the search results page would look like.
>
> http://elbourne.org/swordweb/wordsearchresults.shtml
You should also number search results (1, 2, 3, ...). Not sure w
links.
by grace alone,
Don A. Elbourne Jr.
http://elbourne.org
- Original Message -
From: "David Overcash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface: Mock-up page 1
> > It look
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface: Mock-up page 1
> Don,
> As always, your web interface looks awesome! It did look and resize
> well on Linux/Netscape 7.02. I'm excited to hear o
- Original Message -
From: "David Overcash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface: Mock-up page 1
> > It look really nice, but isn't to much of the space spend with the
&g
> It look really nice, but isn't to much of the space spend with the
> menus?
I agree, looks great! But how about implementing a feature to collapse the
menu of the different texts so it would be a bit smaller? It's somewhat
annoying to have only 30 lines of content with a menu extending 75 line
2003 23:46
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface: Mock-up page 1
Don,
As always, your web interface looks awesome! It did look and
resize
well on Linux/Netscape 7.02. I'm excited to hear others comments on it.
-Troy.
Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
Don,
As always, your web interface looks awesome! It did look and resize
well on Linux/Netscape 7.02. I'm excited to hear others comments on it.
-Troy.
Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
I have one page of the Sword Web interface proposal up. I was hoping to
have several mock pages together by no
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> If someone is able to run a mirror of the Sword web interface on their
> server I would think they would also be able to have write permissions to
> save preferences as well, wouldn't they?.
But, like I stated at some point, they probably will not
ris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface - Customization
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
>
> > I'm guessing that the ability to save preferences across
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Rev. Michael Paul Johnson wrote:
> >What diatheke currently does (and what would be my recommendation) is just
> >set cookies on the client. Nothing is required of the server maintainer.
> >If people disable cookies, the have to live without these features. The
> >only re
At 11:08 28-02-03 -0700, you wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A.
Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> I'm guessing that the ability to save preferences across sessions
will
> require a user/login type of system where the preferences will be
able
> to be saved in a database. Is this doable?
Logins and server-side
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> I'm guessing that the ability to save preferences across sessions will
> require a user/login type of system where the preferences will be able
> to be saved in a database. Is this doable?
Logins and server-side storage of setting adds a lot of co
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> Can we give the web interface a cool sounding project name? :)
How about "Codename: Macceketh"? Or "Sword-web"? Or "The Sword Project
for the Web"?
--Chris
___
sword-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
ot;Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: Standards (was: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface)
> Don,
> That sounds reasonable. I'm really looking forward to your ideas. You
> did such a good j
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Don,
> That sounds reasonable. I'm really looking forward to your ideas. You
> did such a good job with improving the look of the old sword website,
> it's hard to remember how bad the old one used to be!
>
> -Troy.
Let me remind yo
February 23, 2003 8:35 PM
Subject: Standards (was: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface)
I appreciate the comments on standards. It's clear that we need to do
our best to accommodate as many languages and browsers as we can. My
hope is to do this and still allow others to turn features on (if
In a message dated 2/25/2003 6:20:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Please be more carefull in your observations and conclusions. As
> it became a number tossing game I would like to put an end
> to fruitless
> debates and concentrate on what is usefull.
I apology.
_
In a message dated 2/25/2003 1:22:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can use DHTML layers. These can contain markup as well.
No layer please. It is not part of HTML4.0
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 2/25/2003 12:22:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I think we all know there are lies, big lies and statistics.
>
> Who start the number game here? Who start to count the % number of language
> module
does not crop it until character 807. But if we want to put the entire
strongs definition in there, I think we could probably come up with a better
You can use DHTML layers. These can contain markup as well.
Greetings,
Christian
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.web42.com/crenz/ - http://www.we
In a message dated 2/25/2003 12:22:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we all know there are lies, big lies and statistics.
Who start the number game here? Who start to count the % number of language module download? Who start to quote the number and % in this mailling
In a message dated 2/24/2003 11:58:19 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
More or less correct, but it's not exactly clear whether they're counting,
for example, the 1/3 of Malaysians who can read Chinese in both their
Chinese and Bahasa Malaysia statistics (which they should, an
> Troy,
>
> I do not want to be a trouble maker, but was that a "yes" or a "no" to using
> valid markup (X)HTML according to W3c web standards? If yes, what DOCTYPE?
> The only reason I ask is for consistency in development. May I suggest
> structural XHTML 1.0 Transitional. As the New York Public
In a message dated 2/24/2003 4:00:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we could probably come up with a better
method, still short of reverting to _javascript_.
Will the attached page will only use CSS2 without any _javascript_. However, since it heavely use CSS2, it wo
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > (21) Chinese. There are 56.6 M people online in mainland China, according to
> > a report released by the ...
> >
> > I believe the 2.26M people in Singapore online, 5.7 M Malaysians online, and
>
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (21) Chinese. There are 56.6 M people online in mainland China, according to
> a report released by the ...
>
> I believe the 2.26M people in Singapore online, 5.7 M Malaysians online, and
> 1.9 M Americans whoc access the Internet in Chinese a
In a message dated 2/24/2003 11:49:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And please: If you want to use _javascript_ it is your choice, but please make
the website usable for users who have disabled all dynamic functions in their
browsers (like Java, _javascript_, plugins, Activ
In a message dated 2/24/2003 11:31:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My point was just that this site: http://www.glreach.com/globstats/
only shows statistics for "native speakers" which I had interpreted as
meaning "mother tongue speakers". I'm not completely clear, from th
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 8:35 PM
Subject: Standards (was: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface)
> I appreciate the comments on standards. It's clear that we need to do
> our best to accommodate as many languages and browsers as we can. My
>
rd.
> >
> > by grace alone,
> >
> > Don A. Elbourne Jr.
> > http://elbourne.org
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sa
Yes, it uses Javascript.
Nothing I would use on a serious web app, but it's useful to position windows,
resize them and to popup windows with hidden toolbar or menubar, so
navigation windows are not full of browser bars.
Joachim
> Hello,
>
> Am Sonntag, 23. Februar 2003 16:23 schrieb Joachim
Hello
Am Freitag, 21. Februar 2003 23:10 schrieb Troy A. Griffitts:
> I'd love to get input on what features you like/use from other sites,
> and what you would like a web interface to a Bible study tool to look like.
I would suggest a two level support for users.
One level for anonymous users a
Hello,
Am Sonntag, 23. Februar 2003 16:23 schrieb Joachim Ansorg:
> me and my brother spent some minutes on a possible layout and came up with
> http://joachim.ansorgs.de/sword/. This is just a suggestion. The navigation
> window is on the left. There can be multiple windows which are used to rea
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The site you referenced unfortunately assumes everyone in the world is
> > monolingual.
>
> Which site you referenced to is NOT monolingual?
huh?
My point was just that this site: http://www.glreach.com/globstats/
only shows statistics for "nativ
> I think this has been mentioned a few times before, but "Free Software"
> isn't really part of CrossWire's goal. Our use of GPL as a license is
> mostly the result of history and not having anything identifiably
> better. The politics of Free Software are irrelevent to our mission
> and GPL i
In a message dated 2/24/2003 6:40:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>
> Well, do you think there would be any way to integrate a map feature into the
> sword library? That is something that people always
> requested but nobody
> implemented.
>
First of all, we don't have
In a message dated 2/24/2003 3:37:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> :) I've visited your site. Honestly, it's hard for me to say, as I
> cannot read any of it! :) I'm grateful that there is a
> site dedicated
> to Chinese Bible Study!
>
OK, let's do this. I will make
In a message dated 2/24/2003 3:38:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> The site
> you referenced unfortunately assumes everyone in the world
> is monolingual.
Which site you referenced to is NOT monolingual?
___
sword-devel mailin
In a message dated 2/24/2003 12:59:05 AM Eastern Standard Time, YTang0648 writes:
> In a message dated 2/22/2003 9:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> Okay, my guestimates were off. I ran statistics on our downloads in the
> last 5 weeks 76% of downloads were of Engl
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> Perhaps, I didnt put in good terms. The more you deviate from the Free
> Software user base the less help you get. The less help you get the more
> your product suffers. Let's say for example I pick a license that is
> 'incompatable' with the GNU GP
Chris Little said:
> Though I agree portability should be a goal, I think these are actually
> minor concerns. There aren't going to be and don't need to be throngs
Perhaps, I didnt put in good terms. The more you deviate from the Free
Software user base the less help you get. The less help you
> A good Bible software should also offer map. Not sure how many people check
> my http://chinesebiblesrc.sourceforge.net/maptest.html";>http://chinesebi
>blesrc.sourceforge.net/maptest.html
>
> Wonder how can text base browser ever support map
Well, do you think there would be any way to int
:) I've visited your site. Honestly, it's hard for me to say, as I
cannot read any of it! :) I'm grateful that there is a site dedicated
to Chinese Bible Study!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/23/2003 6:33:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joachim,
Thank
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You can look at your number from this angle, or you can look at this
> number from an ROI angle
>
> Which is Number of Dowload of that languages / Number of module that you
> offer in that langauage
>
> If you offer 10 moues in language A and 1 moudle
In a message dated 2/23/2003 6:33:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joachim,
Thanks for the interface idea! I appreciate the time you and your
brother took and your ideas. I don't think I like the idea of poping up
new browser windows. I don't mind a _Create New View_ b
In a message dated 2/22/2003 9:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, my guestimates were off. I ran statistics on our downloads in the
last 5 weeks 76% of downloads were of English modules, 17% were of other
Latin script modules, 4% were of original language modules, and
In a message dated 2/22/2003 9:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Modules in scripts unsupported by the browser can also be transliterated
to Latin pretty easily,
or you can change those brower to support it. For example, Mozilla does not support Burmese, and I am making
Joachim,
Thanks for the interface idea! I appreciate the time you and your
brother took and your ideas. I don't think I like the idea of poping up
new browser windows. I don't mind a _Create New View_ button that would
let the user open a new browser window, but not as a default function.
H
I appreciate the comments on standards. It's clear that we need to do
our best to accommodate as many languages and browsers as we can. My
hope is to do this and still allow others to turn features on (if they
have the support) for a richer user interface.
I don't believe further comment on t
In a message dated 2/23/2003 11:32:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If Troy is going to do the implementation, I think the options are Java,
C, and C++. He seems to have religious objections to Perl and PHP. :)
Since JSword is not at the level needed (most of the module d
In a message dated 2/22/2003 9:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, my guestimates were off. I ran statistics on our downloads in the
last 5 weeks 76% of downloads were of English modules, 17% were of other
Latin script modules, 4% were of original language modules, and
In a message dated 2/22/2003 8:54:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>One option here instead of _javascript_
>would be to use the "title" attribute of the href tag. I created a little
>one verse demo:
I am pretty sure that will work in all browsers, too.
even those text base
In a message dated 2/22/2003 7:53:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I reply:
Yes, you are correct. Technically, all of those broswers support
_javascript_, but without the proper DOM support, what use is _javascript_
in a browser for real applications?
DOM level 0 suppo
On 23 Feb 2003, Derek Neighbors wrote:
> If you want lots of people to propogate this work, you will need to
> construct it in a way that is accessible for them to install and make
> available to their user base. I assume that fulfilling the great
> commission is the goal and so getting something
>On the technical part use JSP (or whatever) modules which do the whole
stuff
> for you, e.g. template systems which only get the content to merge it into a
> static layout. This helps a lot, because other people which are better than
> you in HTML design can make the pages and you fill in the c
Troy,
me and my brother spent some minutes on a possible layout and came up with
http://joachim.ansorgs.de/sword/. This is just a suggestion. The navigation
window is on the left. There can be multiple windows which are used to read a
module. The search would open a new window to browse the sea
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> would be to use the "title" attribute of the href tag. I created a little
> one verse demo:
> http://elbourne.org/temp/titlerollo.htm
>
elinks (text mode browser) shows the bible text, but nothin else. Lynx
also. Konqueror and Mozilla show a popup
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Matthew Donadio wrote:
>
> ECMAScript (EMCA-262) is the official standard for JavaScript.
Or is it standard for ECMAScript, for which JavaScript is an
imlementation? :)
Yours,
Eeli Kaikkonen (Mr.), Oulu, Finland
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with no x)
___
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Joe, jsword is an option to solve this problem if jsp is the httpd
plugin, but I'm not quite sure jsword is there yet, and if I'm wrong,
I'm pretty sure the sword-like api interface isn't close, right?
Creating a Sword like API will be very trivial. Seriously - tell me w
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> :( :( :( very very very western kind of thinking. Don't know how you come out
> that number. (90% and 98%). English user is less than 30% of the total
> Internet users these days. And Latin * charset users is < 70% of the Internet
> users these day
"Don A. Elbourne Jr." wrote:
> I'm not a big fan of JavaScript. I try to avoid it wherever possible, but
> like you said, we may want some features that require it. You mentioned
> hover popups for strongs numbers.
I am fairly sure this would cause compatability problems with older
browsers. You
on definitions and/or a concordance type listing of other
occurrences of the same word.
by grace alone,
Don A. Elbourne Jr.
http://elbourne.org
- Original Message -
From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003
YTang0648 wrote:
What is this web interface really target to? what can we do to make this
one differ from the rest of Bible site which is already there if cannot
use those
W3C standards? I really don't believe it is possible to serve blind
people Bible without rewrite the UI. Will those text brows
(again, please send emails in plain text)
YTang0648 wrote:
Netscape start to support JavaScript since 2.0. JavaScript itself is
never the reason cause those problem (beside people turn it off). The
problem is on
Netscape 4.7, IE5 or Mac IE is the level of DOM support. You are
completed confused
"Troy A. Griffitts" wrote:
> (WHAT IS ECMAScript?).
ECMAScript (EMCA-262) is the official standard for JavaScript.
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/ECMA-262.HTM
--
Matthew Donadio ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
sword-devel mailing lis
In a message dated 2/22/2003 6:40:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Does those text browser support UTF-8, Greek and Hebrew?
lynx supports UTF-8 just fine. Greek / Hebrew would depend on whether the
user has fonts and other things set up correctly for it.
Most users don't
In a message dated 2/22/2003 3:43:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agreed, no frames.
:(
What is this web interface really target to? what can we do to make this one differ from the rest of Bible site which is already there if cannot use those W3C standards? I really don't b
ts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface
> Wow, thanks for all the traffic!
>
> I'm still really looking for user interface ideas (thanks for the ones
> that have been express
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does those text browser support UTF-8, Greek and Hebrew?
lynx supports UTF-8 just fine. Greek / Hebrew would depend on whether the
user has fonts and other things set up correctly for it.
Most users don't care about that though. 90% of users will
In a message dated 2/22/2003 1:32:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems you are not entirely informed. PHP can be completely transparant.
Wether or not valid HTML/XHTML/ is generated is the programmers
responsibility.
But _javascript_ is not an option for anyone us
In a message dated 2/22/2003 12:57:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I know there are no text based browsers which support _javascript_ at
the moment.
Does those text browser support UTF-8, Greek and Hebrew?
Some people use a text mode browser through text termin
Wow, thanks for all the traffic!
I'm still really looking for user interface ideas (thanks for the ones
that have been expressed). The calls to get the data from sword will be
dependent on the dynamic server-side mechanism used; coming up with an
easy access mechanism to the sword engine from
In a message dated 2/22/2003 12:37:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yes it is server side only, so I
don't know how it would affect the different browsers either.
No body ever say it will affect browsers
In a message dated 2/22/2003 12:31:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that there are a fair number of people who are people who
are still using older browsers, especially outside of the US. I use
IE5.5 because I never bothered to upgrade from Win95. I have clie
Hello,
Am Samstag, 22. Februar 2003 20:40 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> add ECMAScript, DOM Level 1, DOM Level 2, and UTF-8 at least please.
about once a week I get information about a security hole in a browser (IE,
Netscape, mozilla, opera, ...) In most cases the hole is in the dynamic part.
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 2/22/2003 8:08:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > PHP is given out free, the same GPL style as we have but different, there
> > are many details to it. PHP is made for many different types of servers a
> I am not agaist the use of php. I am simply against the "no JavaScript
> please" because my browser do not support it request.
>
> Which TEXT based browser do not support JavaScript?
As far as I know there are no text based browsers which support javascript at
the moment.
Some people use a te
You just point out part of the reason why I am extremely for using PHP, in
addition to whatever else. My desire is to be able to use an external PHP
script and Link in to individual parts, and yes it is server side only, so I
don't know how it would affect the different browsers either.
By the Gra
(please send email to mailing lists in plain text format...)
YTang0648 wrote:
A browser which support ECMAScript/JavaScript which called Mozilla is
also given out free, a different open source license, MPL, is with it.
Mozilla is
made for many different types of client OS and is very common too.
In a message dated 2/22/2003 8:08:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PHP is given out free, the same GPL style as we have but different, there are many details to it. PHP is made for many different types of servers and is very common.
By the Grace of God,
A browser which s
In a message dated 2/22/2003 7:31:17 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another feature, similar to the "passage study" I presented in the other
email would be a "word study." This could take advantage of your KJV2003.
The user could input a passage and be given a list of links fo
In a message dated 2/22/2003 7:01:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>Therefore, if you want to talk about standard, you really need to DEFINE
the set of standards you are talking about.
I did. XHTML and CSS.
http://www.w3.org/
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/
http://www.w3.or
ok... I have one new request for the web interface
All the result should be abel to access through a GET url. We should not use POST with we try to GET thing.
This is important so people can LINK against such result outside the system.
All the actions of retriving data from the SWORD is to GET
Title: Message
PHP is given out
free, the same GPL style as we have but different, there are many details to it.
PHP is made for many different types of servers and is very
common.
By the Grace of
God,
Dan Adams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://dana.ucc.nau.edu/~dpa3 1 Peter
4:10 (NIV)- Each
Troy,
One feature that I would like to see would be, for lack of a better title,
"Passage Study." Here is how it would work for the user: Let's say someone
wants to do a study of Romans 8:28-30. They could input this reference into
a form field and be presented with a list of grouped links. The li
Another feature, similar to the "passage study" I presented in the other
email would be a "word study." This could take advantage of your KJV2003.
The user could input a passage and be given a list of links for every Greek
word found in the passage with either the full text of the entry for the
wor
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface
>>Therefore, if you want to talk about standard, you really need to DEFINE
the set of standards you are talking about.
I did. XHTML a
Just a quick note in case anyone wasn't aware - you can already use
Sword on the web via JSword. There is a servlet/jsp front end which was
easy to develop.
You can see a demo here:
http://www.crosswire.org/jsword/demo
Joe.
___
sword-devel mailing li
In a message dated 2/21/2003 10:18:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>How about more capable searching? :-)
I agree with this suggestion... I've often found that I may try to search
for a specific phrase and it would not come up, even though I would be
looking at the exact t
In a message dated 2/21/2003 10:08:42 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about more capable searching? :-)
Could you be explicit about what you are talking about? What do you mean "more capable"?
In a message dated 2/21/2003 9:03:54 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In terms of underlying implementation, I would (not too surprisingly)
suggest something similar to diatheke--that is, written in C. It allows
easy porting to different platforms and between CGI, ISAPI, and
In a message dated 2/21/2003 4:02:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess I didn't catch this one, but PHP which I suggested earlier can
output whatever you choose. PHP is server side code/processing.
But which SERVER support php? Your apach server may support php but if s
In a message dated 2/21/2003 3:51:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh no, please, no _javascript_! I use text mode browsers often. Modern text mode
browsers can handle even tables ands frames, but not _javascript_.
ECMAScript IS standard. DOM is standard so... what is
> On February 21, 2003 14:10, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> > Currently, I'm planning to spend next month working on a web interface
> > to the sword engine.
> >
> > I'd love to get input on what features you like/use from other sites,
> > and what you would like a web interface to a Bible study tool
On February 21, 2003 14:10, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Currently, I'm planning to spend next month working on a web interface
> to the sword engine.
>
> I'd love to get input on what features you like/use from other sites,
> and what you would like a web interface to a Bible study tool to look like
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
